Kayleigh McEnany runs through voting allegations in 234 pages of affidavits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88jWxiC9orM
bkm
Joseph Cotto is saying one of the strategies the Trump team is stalling. This is now an official record about vote counting and how observers are treated. I suspect this isn’t their most lethal lawsuit but only delays the vote certification process. I believe they have more effective lawsuits waiting to be unleashed.
You are correct. Kayleigh McEnaney described them on Hannity tonight. She waved around a sheaf of papers and described the complaints of people who voted being called names or their ethnicity was insulted. Those were the signed affidavits they were promoting as earth shattering evidence of fraud.
This is NOT going to force recounts or rejection of ballots. If this is the best the White House can come up with, they have no case.
Doesn’t look to be enough...
This is a poorly written piece altogether. Lacks substance and certainly not the ‘meat” of what they’re finding.
Well, you can throw up your hands and do just as the communists want, surrender to them. Or, you can say that this is substantial sworn testimony that the people weren’t allowed to do what they are by law allowed to do — observe the counting, as a fraud-preventing measure. You don’t try to hide something that doesn’t matter if it’s shown, obviously. Yes, that isn’t enough on its own merits, but it justifies the Trump campaign going after the significant fraud we all know happened.
Weak. Disappointing.
They need to go after the machines instead. Still too many things that don’t add up there.
8 ballots in question here, 5 there, and on and on with small numbers like that. All totals up to 30-40?
What a big nothing burger.
I think the Dominion machines is one angle worth looking at. Potentialy several hundred thousand ballots.
The other is simply that Judges, Governors, SoSs are not the ones who change election rules and procedures. The State legislature does that. Plain as can be in the US Constitution. Any 2020 election process changes NOT done by legislation should be canceled out. If that includes all mail-in ballots in some States, so be it.
If that means no one makes 270, so be it. It will be an election by electors.
Question is, does the Supreme Court, knowing the rioting that will happen, have the balls to do the right thing and cancel out millions of ballots in these swing States?