Well, you can throw up your hands and do just as the communists want, surrender to them. Or, you can say that this is substantial sworn testimony that the people weren’t allowed to do what they are by law allowed to do — observe the counting, as a fraud-preventing measure. You don’t try to hide something that doesn’t matter if it’s shown, obviously. Yes, that isn’t enough on its own merits, but it justifies the Trump campaign going after the significant fraud we all know happened.
It doesn't matter what I do, it matters what a court does, and in all likelihood they'll laugh this one out (if it actually gets submitted) like almost all the other lawsuits.
These affidavits are not that substantial. The alleged affidavits that Rudy G talked about on Real America’s Voice are much more substantial.
One thing that I will say about these affidavits is that they start building a body of evidence that might justify interviewing the poll workers, but in summary they are pretty weak against the numbers we are talking about.
The big changes were documented in the data and were either the result of ballot stuffing (for which there are supposedly witnesses) and the software systems.