Posted on 11/10/2020 4:13:20 AM PST by otness_e
The myth of Che Guevara - recycled yet again in Steven Soderberg’s new film ‘Che’ - is seductive and lush. It’s the story of an Argentinian rich-boy who was so shocked by poverty he became a Robin Hood fighting alongside the poor, until eventually he was murdered by the CIA. But the reality of Che Guevara is very different. The facts show that he was a totalitarian with a messiah streak, who openly wanted to impose Maoist tyranny on the world. He was so fanatical that at the hottest moment in the Cold War, he even begged the Soviet Union to nuke New York or Washington or Los Angeles and bring about the end of the world.
It is true that Che’s story begins with a motorcycle journey across South America. The young man was repulsed by the gap between the swanky transplanted European culture in which he lived and the starving misery of the indigenous peoples. He could see that this was caused largely by America’s habit of smashing local governments and replacing them with dictators prepared to slobber over US corporations. But he concluded from that journey - gradually, over a few short years - that there was only one solution: the imposition of authoritarian communism, by force, everywhere. He chose not to see that this system, wherever it is tried, makes people even poorer still, invariably spreading famine, starvation, and terror.
Since the Soviet Union was too soft for his tastes, there were only two countries that Che found truly admirable: Maoist China and Kim Il Sung’s North Korea. He bragged that there was “not a single discrepancy” between Mao’s world view and his own. As Che was happily fawning over Mao in the flesh in Beijing, in the surrounding countryside there was an epidemic of mothers cutting off the flesh from their inner thighs to feed it to their starving children. The programme that caused this biting hunger - the mass collectivisation of the farms - represented “true socialist morality”, Che said. The dictator killed 70 million people in the end, cheered on by his guerrilla friend at every stage.
Of course, Che’s defenders act as if this was the only choice confronted by Latin Americans: you were either for US-imposed market fundamentalism, or for Maoist Communism. But you don’t have to look very far in Che’s life to see that this is a lie. His diaries show that he was constantly appalled to discover that almost everyone around him, including the revolutionaries fighting by his side, did not share his Maoist vision for the future. His first wife, Hilda Gadea, was a social democrat. She wanted to depose the US-backed tyrants - and then replace them with moderate, Swedish-style mixed economies. Che ridiculed and pilloried her as “bourgeois”, before abandoning both her and their child. The ordinary Cubans he fought alongside on the Sierra Maestre also wanted to create a democracy with a mixed economy. Disgusted, Che noted in his diary: “I discovered the evident anti-communist inclinations of most of them.”
When Che and Fidel Castro’s guerrilla army seized power in Cuba, he was immediately - and to his delight - put in charge of the firing squads. He instituted a system of ‘trials’ that lasted just a few hours, with himself as sole judge. They invariably ended with the low-level functionaries of the Batista regime being lined up and shot. Che’s public declarations from that time are blunt. “All right, it is dictatorship,” he shouted at one point. “It’s criminal to think of the needs of the individual.” He even banned Santa Claus, saying he was an “American imperialist import.”
The friend who had traveled with Che on the famous motorcycle journeys, David Mitrani, was shocked when they met up in Havana after the revolution. He could not understand how Che’s compassionate response to poverty all those years ago had led him to announce he now wanted to become an “ effective, violent, selective, and cold killing machine”.
Che’s fanaticism reached its peak in October 1963, when he seriously advocated a course of action that would immediately end life on earth. Che had implored the Soviet Union to place nuclear missiles on Cuba. He knew the US would interpret this as an act of aggression and probably retaliate with nuclear weapons - but he said that “the people [of Cuba] you see today tell you that even if they should disappear from the face if the earth because an atomic war is unleashed in their names... they will feel completely happy and fulfilled” knowing the revolution had inspired people for a while. Che did not say how he knew the Cuban people would be delighted to die of radiation sickness, their hair burning on their heads and their skin slopping from their faces.
The Soviet Union followed Che’s advice - and the world came closer to nuclear annihilation than at any point before or since. On the American side, maniacs like General Curtis LeMay implored Jack Kennedy to nuke Moscow immediately. On the Soviet side, Che Guevara played exactly the same role. He urged Khrushchev to launch a nuclear strike, now, against US cities. For the rest of his life, he declared that if his finger had been on the button, he would have pushed it. When Khrushchev backed down and literally saved the world, Che was furious at the “betrayal”. If Che’s recommendations had been followed, you would not be reading this newspaper now.
None of these facts are seriously disputed by historians; they are simply skidded over by Che’s Soderberg-style defenders, who stick to romantic generalities about how he stood for “honesty” and “revolution”. But Che Guevara is not a free-floating icon of rebellion. He was an actual person who supported an actual system of tyranny, one that murdered millions more actual people.
If the small lingering band of communo-nostalgists who still revere Che were honest about continuing his life’s work, they would have to form a group called “Left-Wingers for Creating a Universal North Korea, Prior to Universal Death in a Nuclear Winter.” I don’t think they would find many recruits.
Condemnation of leftist icon Che from the HuffPo?
And Fox news becoming yet another democrat agitprop organ?
2020 is the strangest year in my lifetime!
Well, to be fair, this was dated back in 2009, but even still...
that is the funniest thing I have seen in a while. :D
This author faces termination from Huffpo for this transgression against brave communist revolutionary Che.
Its from 2009, an era where the truth in media was “a little” more prevalent. My guess is that if this were posted today the people who read that rag would march on the author’s home and burn it to its foundations.
What the heck, 2009, come on guys. I was fooled.
They may yet. Wrongthink does not have an expiration date. Putting this back up is to highlight an old crime.
The power of the propagandists, most dumb a## college kids and many adults dont know a thing about but were on the band wagon because its popular
Still, I didn’t expect them to even condemn him back in 2009, since he was pretty dang popular among far-left publications even back then (and I’d know, I played Peace Walker which was released barely over a year after that article was released, and had Che being treated as the second coming of Christ in that game).
Probably the only thing I could think of is that the author was a guest who wrote for a group known as The Independent.
Wow, I can’t believe it.
Denigrating Che?
Even denigrating “communism”?
Sure, there are tell-tale remarks coloring our views, such as “social democrat”, “mixed economy” and “Kruschev literally saved the world”.
How did this slip by the Kommisars at HuffPo?
Also George LeMay being called a psycho at one point in the article for wanting to nuke Moscow, though even there, the fact that they made clear Che was psychotic for wanting to nuke the US, regardless of whether they dragged LeMay in the mud in the process, is very unusual especially for such a left-wing rag, even back then, much less today (and speaking as someone who has played and nearly got tricked by Peace Walker regarding Che, I can definitely confirm that Che love was all the rage around the time among left-wing circles. In fact, it was that game that had Hideo Kojima coming out of the leftist closet. As you can see: https://youtu.be/kU9TYw4oEj8 And that was just one example of the sickening Che Guevara love that game gave. Did I mention that Miller and Snake are the game’s protagonists? Or that despite another tape talking in depth of how the Cuban Missile Crisis nearly caused all out nuclear war with particular emphasis on how Japan panicked at the time, Che Guevara’s ties to that event are about as silent as cricket sounds.).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.