Posted on 11/08/2020 9:00:43 AM PST by CheshireTheCat
You’re not understanding. The premise is “how can the Democrats cheat the totals without arousing suspicion?” The answer is to make one of every five ballots for Trump. It means they have to produce more overall ballots and maybe they’re afraid of more union overtime but when inner-city votes say 20% backed Trump, the counters can say “See? it’s plausible to believe that 80% voted for Biden.”
But, you know if they get away with this, why should they care that everyone knows they cheated.
The anomalous are enough to get the votes in those precincts in question thrown out of the totals.
Bingo!
I agree. The real question is whether the powers that be will actually throw them out or just say, "Oh, well." I hope the legislatures have enough character to throw them out. But they are afraid of the immediate consequences, being called racist. They are not nearly as afraid of the long term consequences as those are some ways down the road.
These days, being called racist is worse than being called a baby killer.
Even more ridiculous is the assumption that Dem areas (by registered voters) were all in for Biden; Trump attracted many Dems last time, and certainly did again.
Are ballots not checked against a voter registration roll? How are they verified?
The best way to flesh this out would be to conduct a by-hand recount in the states and counties that used that Dominion software. It’s worth the effort, wait and cost.
Election law usually deals with certainties. Hard numbers interact in certain ways.
Assume an election contest with proven fraud, or questionable ballots (don’t know/can’t trust choice) that numbers 3,000. That does not, of itself, cause an issue. The court next looks to the margin of victor. If the fraud or unknown is 3,000, and the margin is 3,001, the contest is decided in favor of the winner.
The only people who believe these results are valid are the DEMs. Yeah, sure there was fraud, they’ll say, but not enough to make up the margin, and you can’t prove a sufficient number of fraudulent ballots.
On any given ballot, preponderance is not enough, preponderance being 50/50. I think the standard on a single ballot is something like reasonable certainty. If you aren’t reasonably sure what the voter wanted, toss it.
Tough case with all the single race ballots. POTUS only, nothing down ballot. No question how they voted, crystal clear. But there is no way on earth to know if the mark was made by a legal voter. You can suspect, sure. But you can’t prove. Even the statistical improbabilities of 10,000 to 1 is not enough to prove.
Up to the court to deal with it. That’s why they make the big bucks. They’ll pick whatever outcome suits their political preference, and justify the decision with 100 pages of insomnia-breaking prose.
-——We need to have facts.——
Need or want?
It is in the short run not in out best interest to reveal all the known facts against the Biden vote fraud. The evidence will be revealed at the trial
You see the new math? 4 + 4 = 9 some days and 12 others because math is a racist white invention.
If they only did the fraud 20/80, they would have lost.
Can any one point me to the data they are citing that violate Benford’s law? The tweets linked in this article have some hard to read graphics and no links to underlying data. There are enough conspiracy nutters out there that it is hard to believe any of this without digging deeper. Otherwise, we will end up chasing red herrings that lead to no where until time runs out.
If they did 20-80, they would have to do 2/3 more fake ballots. At 20-80, they are only making a +60 for Biden out of each 100. Lazy, or just recognizing the odds of being caught, or lack of time and assets?
Well, they are democRATS, so...
“So what is required, a preponderance of the evidence or reasonable doubt???”
Rudy is saying they have both:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3903777/posts
This is a continuance of the deep state coup. What previously was tin-foil hat paranoia is reality. The deep state is real and they are powerful.
Appreciate it. I should probably keep up better.
Well, a large chunk of the population can’t do maths and think math is racist. So, there’s that...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.