Posted on 11/07/2020 3:23:27 AM PST by TigerClaws
As the vote counting for the 2020 Presidential Election continues, various facts suggest rampant frauds in Joe Biden’s votes. So does mathematics in terms of the votes from precincts.
Benford’s law or the first-digit law, is used to check if a set of numbers are naturally occurring or manually fabricated. It has been applied to detect the voting frauds in Iranian 2009 election and various other applications including forensic investigations.
This is what described by Wikipedia:
“Benford’s law, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading digit is likely to be small.
For example, in sets that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time, while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. If the digits were distributed uniformly, they would each occur about 11.1% of the time. Benford’s law also makes predictions about the distribution of second digits, third digits, digit combinations, and so on.”
One of the examples is the population of the world, which are naturally occurring numbers.
Distribution of first-digit (in %) of population numbers in 237 countries in 2010. Source: wikipedia.org A number of people on the internet have checked the votes (precinct by precinct) of Joe Biden, Donald Trump as well as other candidates for their legitimacy in terms of the Benford’s Law.
According a Reddit user, r/dataisbeautiful’s calculation, the ‘normal’ distribution of first digits for the different candidates based on Benford’s law is illustrated below.
Wiki explanation of the Law which was apparently edited on November 5th...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law
Dems won’t follow the science
Duh.
PA also violated the U. S. Constitution and has a pile of invalid votes.
It is a State Legislative issue, not a State Judicial issue. THAT is what the SCOTUS can remind the States.
I think this will all end in the Supreme Court. The SC will take a stand against vote fraud - as it undermines the Republic. Their opinion will be one for the ages. It will go down with Marburg v Madison, Brown v Board of Education.
The Supreme Court is needed to restore America’s faith in the voting system. It should be a 9-0 decision, but I have faith that there are at least 5 who will stand with America.
Had to think about this before realizing why. Its usually more likely to have a few than to have many. Including a few 10s or a few 100s etc.
Anything suspicious in the recent wiki revisions?
Has there been any comparison of the number of ballots that were only filled out for Biden vs. ballots only filled out for Trump? I think what you will find is the Biden-only ballots greatly exceed the Trump-only ballots because the Democrats were in a hurry to cheat and they filled out an extreme number of Biden-only ballots.
I pray our side gets a day in court soon and has tons of evidence and data like this to make the cheating crystal clear for all to see.
In the case of PA Trump’s team is arguing that the state SC overstepped its Constitutional bounds when it legislated the dates in the state law. The US Constitution specifically restricts all election matters to the Legislative, not the Judicial branch. The courts may adjudicate whether the law is followed. It may not prescribe election law.
Wiki explanation of the Law which was apparently edited on November 5th...
—
Wikipedia making a change to the description of a mathematical law *after* the election is as Orwellian as Merriam Webster making a change to the definition of the word “preference” after the ACB hearings.
I’ve never used drugs in my life. Never even smoked a cigarette. But if you are relying on SCOTUS to do the right thing, I’ll have some of whatever drug you’re using.
Soapbox - censored
Ballot box - stuffed
Jury box - corrupted
Ammo box - ajar
What I want to know is has there ever been a POTUS election where so many states came within a 10th of a point apart? This is really suspicious like they made just enough fake ballots to put Biden in the lead. Take Georgia for example 49.4 to 49.3 or PA, Biden 4/10th of a point above Trump. Trump was ahead in those states especially PA where he was almost TEN points above Biden with 86% of precincts reporting in, and in a day Biden takes the lead? What??
As a very general comment — One of my problems with our legal system is that our lawyers and judges are all about technicalities. Hey, you need an air-tight case in which you absolutely prove that something happened. Maybe Joe’s numbers increase EXACTLY 99998888 in every single contested state. Maybe that seems very odd. Maybe that seems to violate Benford’s Law. So what? You haven’t PROVED anything!
For me, I want justice. I know fraud when I see it. Biden committed fraud. Benford’s Law seems good and useful and convincing to me (in addition to so much else). I have a real problem with legal minds who see the injustice staring them in the face and who will just shrug and say, yeah, but where’s the proof??
That's because, in earlier times, statistical analysis and polling were not as refined / prevalent.
Yes, the poll numbers that we, the general public, are being fed are "cooked" - but the numbers laid on the table in smoke-filled backrooms are the genuine article. And that's where the campaign money is apportioned out. So, of course, more time, effort, money, and overall resources are going to be poured into contended states (so-called "battleground states"), where it will do the most good (or at least: has the greatest chance of doing some good).
As a consequence, more and more elections will end up being "hotly contested," "close calls," and "near ties."
Because, if you are spending billions of dollars to win an election, you of course want to spend just barely enough to obtain a result which is just barely good enough - and not a penny more.
No one actually funding a campaign wants a "landslide."
Regards,
H*MMER AND SC*RECARD news is being disappeared rapidly from Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. Watch this while you can.
Sidney Powell, Tom Fitton, Lou Dobbs discuss H*mmer & Sc*recard
November 6, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVDB8_JWL0c&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=TedPikul
This is both awesome and legit. Of course, if it ever makes it into the lamestream media, it will be called “an obscure and discredited game theory that was used as a party trick, before computers were invented, to guess people’s birthdays. Also used by carnival barkers and street magicians to guess a person’s weight.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.