Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Says Joe Biden Could Put Hillary Clinton On The Supreme Court
thefederalist ^ | 10/27/2020 | Tristan Justice

Posted on 10/27/2020 6:54:22 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough proposed nominating 73-year-old former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court next year should Democrats take the White House in next week’s election.

“What a great birthday gift it will be next year for @HillaryClinton when she is one of the three new Supreme Court justices appointed through the Judiciary Reform Act of 2021,” Scarborough tweeted Monday following Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s historic confirmation.

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amyconeybarrett; biden; clinton; cnbc; joescarborough; mikabrzezinski; morningjoe; msnbc; nbc; nobrainscollectively; scarborough; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: SmokingJoe
Not to mention with her alcoholism Hillary may have a hard time getting to the Supreme Court


21 posted on 10/27/2020 7:06:25 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Joe Biden: Barack Obama minus the pretty talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Hillary on the USSC is Scabby telling Republicans why Joe MUST lose.

Good one.

22 posted on 10/27/2020 7:06:26 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Does Hillary have any judicial background?

Why YES she does, she was FIRED from the Watergate Prosecution for being the most Unethical and DISHONEST Lawyer Ziefman had ever met.


23 posted on 10/27/2020 7:07:53 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

One of my favorite dreams starts with Hillary walking into a courtroom - as a DEFENDANT.


24 posted on 10/27/2020 7:08:29 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

That would be silly considering her age. Remember how well she held up during the 2016 campaign.


25 posted on 10/27/2020 7:08:57 AM PDT by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Waste a pick on an old hag?


26 posted on 10/27/2020 7:09:46 AM PDT by VastRWCon (Fake News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
To pass such an act, the democrats would need control of both houses of congress and the Whitehouse. Don't let that happen.
27 posted on 10/27/2020 7:18:01 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

She has the only qualification needed to be on the court. She is breathing.


28 posted on 10/27/2020 7:19:48 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Does Hillary have any judicial background? Has she ever served as a judge in any court? Does she have a degree in anything but liberal arts?

Precisely the reason he is recommending her. The left thinks the Supreme Court is the Supreme Legislature. So it's appropriate for them to want to put politicians on it.

29 posted on 10/27/2020 7:20:21 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
“What a great birthday gift it will be next year for @HillaryClinton when she is one of the three new Supreme Court justices appointed through the Judiciary Reform Act of 2021,”

Three? That would give the Court 12 Justices. It needs to be an odd number in order to eliminate ties.

Plus, I think the court will be packed from nine to 15, so that the Dims can appoint six new Justices to guarantee a Liberal majority for at least the next 20 years.

30 posted on 10/27/2020 7:21:03 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: organicchemist

Her superb memory would kick in, she wouldn’t be able to recall anything.


31 posted on 10/27/2020 7:21:24 AM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Does she have a degree in anything but liberal arts?

She has a J.D. from Yale Law.

She was on the original Watergate investigation staff.

32 posted on 10/27/2020 7:23:05 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobL

She looks like shes packed and headin to see Ruth Ginsberg.


33 posted on 10/27/2020 7:23:41 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Maggots are munching on what is left of Scarface’s brain - soon he will need depends permanently


34 posted on 10/27/2020 7:24:55 AM PDT by BigEdLB (BigedLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

She has a law degree from Yale.

Her legal experience is:

1 A partner at a now defunct Arkansas legal firm where she was a “rainmaker” (Because of being married to the AG & later governor. She was able to steer business to the firm.),

2. Getting fired from the Watergate committee.


35 posted on 10/27/2020 7:27:09 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

He can’t be series?

Dems would never WASTE a seat on the court for that OLD bat.


36 posted on 10/27/2020 7:29:27 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArtDodger

Kamala did hers at Neil, Suckette and Moane...


37 posted on 10/27/2020 7:32:38 AM PDT by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Well,one thing's for sure...if a case involving a child rapist is considered by SCOTUS Crooked Justice ILLary will vote to help him rather than the victim(s) of the rapist.
38 posted on 10/27/2020 7:33:16 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (BLM Stands For "Bidens Loot Millions"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Joe is getting really insane!


39 posted on 10/27/2020 7:33:37 AM PDT by AZJeep (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0AHQkryIIs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The confirmation process would go pretty quickly with Democrats in charge. They would sing her praises with how masterfully she managed the questions from the senators. Of course, with stacks of books and reference materials around here, all her answers would be “I don’t recall” or “what difference does it make at this point?”

Then we would hear how imminently qualified she is . . .


40 posted on 10/27/2020 7:33:57 AM PDT by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson