Posted on 10/12/2020 3:01:20 PM PDT by ml/nj
[Full text minus the links.]
NOTE: Readers have sent me electron microscope images of what are claimed to be “isolated COVID virus.” An image here, an image there—this is NOT the way science is done, as I will explain fully in this article.
I have also been sent a CDC document that claims the COVID virus has been isolated. However, that document is dated two months earlier than the CDC document that admits they do not have the virus. So it means nothing.
Last week, I wrote and published two articles (here and here) exposing the root of the poisonous tree: the CDC admits it does not have an isolated COVID virus.
Therefore, SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic virus, has never been proved to exist.
This shattering fact reveals the whole pandemic is a fraud. The virus, the test, the case numbers—all fraud. And the lockdowns were unnecessary and criminal.
Now I want to reveal the study that should have been done, at the outset, when scientists were first claiming there was a pandemic based on the discovery of “a new virus.”
Here’s what you would do if you were an actual scientist: you would line up a minimum of 500 people who have been diagnosed with the epidemic illness. From each of them, you would extract tissue samples.
Then you would correctly and meticulously put each sample through a procedure that would result in 500 viewable electron microscope photographs—one from each patient. You would lay all these photos side by side.
You would answer three burning questions: do you see, in each and every photo, MANY particles of the same virus? Do you see, in all 500 photos, that same virus? Do you see, in all 500 photos, a virus you’ve never seen before?
If your answer to any of these questions is no, you go back to the drawing board. You haven’t found sufficient evidence of a new virus that is causing widespread illness.
If your answer is yes to every question, other researchers will then line up 500 new volunteers who have been diagnosed with the epidemic illness, and they will perform this same experiment, in order to confirm or deny the findings of the first team of scientists.
If they, too, answer every burning question with a yes, then a third team of researchers performs their own experiment on 500 more volunteers. And if their answer to every question is yes, then you have something. Then you have an indication, according to conventional and traditional methods, that a new disease could be on the rise.
People continue to send me an occasional electron microscope photo from a research study on “the coronavirus.” Of course, as you can see, that is not what I’m talking about at all. A single photo from here, from there—irrelevant.
If you were an honest medical researcher, would you claim the result of giving a new drug to three patients justified the approval of that drug for use on a few hundred million patients? Not a chance. The same basic principle applies here.
The study I just described, with 500 patients each time, done several times with new teams, is what the scientific method demands: large studies; clear results; and then confirmation or rejection of the initial finding, by more scientists employing the same methods and materials.
One critic, after reading my description of the proper way to do a study on the purported “new coronavirus,” said, “This wouldn’t work because it is extremely labor-intensive.” Well, guess what? The result of declaring a pandemic caused by a virus that isn’t there…and the ensuing lockdowns and economic and human destruction stemming from that declaration…is “labor-intensive” to a far greater degree.
Stopping the production engine of the world on the pretext of finding a new virus, when no new virus has been correctly found and isolated, is a crime that supersedes the sweat and effort of doing proper science.
As far as what is actually going on in labs where researchers are fiddling with genetic sequences of this and that and making vast proclamations; don’t talk to me about science. Talk to me about liability and prison.
This seems so blatant to me that I wonder if I am missing something.
ML/NJ
More PROOF that wearing a mask is STUPID!!!!
CDC Study Finds Overwhelming Majority Of People Getting Coronavirus Wore Masks
The World Health Organization just admitted that I was right. Lockdowns are killing countries all over the world. The cure cannot be worse than the problem itself. Open up your states, Democrat governors. Open up New York. A long battle, but they finally did the right thing!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 12, 2020
fake flu bump
.
Do you remember being ordered to lock down during the 2009-2010 Obama/Biden pandemic?
Do you remember being ordered to wear masks during the 2009-2010 Obama/Biden pandemic?
Do you remember the media going crazy 24/7 over the 2009-2010 Obama/Biden pandemic?
What CDC did then: https://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/cdcresponse.htm
There is no proof wearing masks is stupid. There is no proof wearing a mask slows viral spread and no proof mask are ineffective. Risk management says it’s smart to wear one.
Absolute nonsense.
What your missing is that Rappaport is FOS, deliberately misunderstanding and misrepresenting the CDC documents to create clickbait articles for the revenue it generates and people keep posting his crap here.
You don’t need proof that wearing masks is stupid. Wearing masks is stupid. Risk management doesn’t say anything about wearing masks. But thanks for participating.
It’s all the biggest hoax ever put on the world.
Lots of proof that masks don’t do anything. Go ahead and wear one and be a good little follower and a virtual signaler to the new world order.
You can’t hear.
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
Page 39: Performance Characteristics
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available...”
The key word in that sentence is “quantified.”
They are trying to determine how many coronaviruses must be present in a micro-liter sample for the PCR test to show positive.
They would prefer to use quantified “live” virus samples - in other words, samples with a known number of live viruses in each sample.
However, they do not have such samples, which most likely would be very expensive to make and would require extreme safety procedures.
Instead, they reproduce just the RNA in the lab, and count how many copies of the RNA are in each micro-liter so they can certify the PCR test.
If they know how to reproduce the RNA in the lab, they have to have a sample of a live virus some place, even if it is not the coronavirus.
All those years in the army with no ear protection maybe, but I can still read.
The virus sits on a nice warm, moist mask waiting for some buddies and about the 40th breath you take they are pulled in.
Its like a lil vacay. Rest n wait. If they were on your cool, cilly skin.. not so much.
That and wearing a mask means constantly touching your face.
People are not wearing them over their nose. If you need to take a breath, unco er your mouth.. it doesn’t colonize there.
Says you but the facts say a different story. This 1.5 micron virus easily passes through most available masks so it really isn't smart to wear one. It's an annoyance, it's germ-filled in no time, and it's ugly as sin. Then there's the reduction in oxygen intake at a time when most people need all they can get; when they are out and about doing things that make them breathe harder.
I don't begrudge anyone who wants to wear a face diaper if they think it will help them. I do begrudge anyone who insists I wear one when I know they don't work to stop a virus. Helping is not stopping. Almost dead is not dead. Almost alive is not alive.
Having said all that there are times when I in fact do where a face mask and that's when it will keep me from breathing in kicked up dust and dirt while I mow weeds or something like that. I wear a special one when I paint using toxic automotive paints.
I'm in the camp that believes this entire thing is 90% political and 10% medical. It's a Plandemic; not a pandemic. It has been politically weaponized for a specific purpose that branches out into other veins of destruction. Why else would this be treated so radically different than recent pandemics like the bird and swine flu's?
That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
I doubt it’s fake but it’s nothing more than another strain of the flu which happens yearly.
As far as Jon Rappaport... tin foil hat kinda guy.
OK, but what did Trump just test negative for and what did he test positive for about 10 days ago?
“There is no proof wearing masks is stupid. There is no proof wearing a mask slows viral spread and no proof mask are ineffective. Risk management says it’s smart to wear one.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.