P
IS THE FBI WAITING UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION TO ADDRESS WHISTLEBLOWER PHIL HANEYS VIOLENT DEATH?
Is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holding back information regarding the violent death of Phil Haney because of the election? Why is the Amador County Sheriffs office staying quiet? How long will Americans stay silent before demanding answers?
Whistleblower Phil Haney, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was found dead after being shot in the chest on February 21, 2020 in California, not far from Sacramento. The local police immediately reached out to the FBI, despite the clear potential conflict of interest. Mr. Haney called out the Obama administration for forcing government intelligence to remove terrorist ties of Mosques in America. In his book, See Something, Say Nothing, he documented ties that he believed could have stopped the Islamic San Bernardino and Orlando terror attacks. He was writing a new book that was to be published before the 2020 election. Before that book could be published, Mr. Haney was found dead in a park and ride area three miles from his home.
Mr. Haney, a devout Christian, was known to carry a thumb drive around his neck populated with information damning to the federal government that was to be in his next book. Knowing that he was potentially in danger, Mr. Haney confided in several people that he would never commit suicide. RAIR Foundation spoke with two of these people: Film Director Judd Saul and Iowa Pastor Cary Gordan (Read about that here).
Back in July, RAIR Foundation USA submitted questions (twice) to the Amador County Sheriffs office, and did not receive a response. Instead, a local report dated July 23, 2020 indicated that officials expect FBI reports and analysis within the next few weeks and hope to complete their review shortly thereafter, comparing it with the information they have gathered from their own case investigation.
Today is October 1st. It is difficult not to consider that the reason the politicized FBI is staying quiet is not based on evidence, but something more nefarious.
Read the details at RAIR about Mr. Haneys life and violent death. Please also see RAIRs timeline of events.
(LINKS)
There’s a lot of dead bodies out there. A lot of convenient suicides. It sure would be nice if the authorities started tying up the loose ends. Don’t have to start with Vince Foster, but I hope he gets his turn.
Damn.
are the Russians glad that they don’t live in the United States?
Good to see Steve is still around
Steve Kings problems began with Washington Examiners Williamson who could have cited the many times the New York Times has been cited for using misquotes when assembling his report on Cruz and Scotts reaction to of condemnation to the alleged racist remarks made by Iowa Congressman Steve King . Williamson could have as well then ask both US Senators Scott and Cruz Can the New York Times under those circumstances be trusted ask if they considered that and include their reaction when making their statements in his report..
What King was denouncing was the assertions raised by the NYT interviewer using questions that reference common idoms used but are being attacked in socialist revisionist propaganda circles as racist. That technique method is similar to NYT use of questions about LGBT practices when seeking a reaction from by a religious figure.. Which have been manipulated and blown up to be prohibited expressions under guise of being politically incorrect ..
What Williamson did was because of his lazy journalism. Which is common practice unfortuantely in too many so called conservative communication venues in visual,print and talk radio. Was to support and continue to validate the “politically correct posture regurgitated by socialist revisionists.
Phil was a fighter, not a coward. This demands a federal investigation because of his extensive intelligence work and what he know.
He was a very good, patriotic man and friend.
.
ping in memory of Philip Haney.