Posted on 10/10/2020 3:31:35 AM PDT by Kaslin
Up to now we have endured a pair of debates between the candidates running for the White House and the results have been anything but encouraging. The fractured messaging and distemper on display have been expected, but when looking at those who were in command of these contests there has been both concern and disappointment. Now there is a possibility it might become worse, that is if the next conflict scheduled for Miami happens to take place.
After long weeks of speculation the lid-happy Joe Biden actually managed to attend the first presidential debate against Donald Trump, and it was an off the rails mess of an event. That night was filled with petulance, anger, interruptions, and contentious comments throughout. However, as much as everyone seems in agreement it was a fiasco and an embarrassment, neither of the candidates seemed to come off looking as bad as moderator Chris Wallace. Aside from having a complete lack of control, Wallace was combative, asked loaded questions, and seemed so in opposition to the president that Trump even commented it was as if he were debating two people that evening.
This week we were presented with a far more civil debate between the vice presidential candidates, but that civil affair would largely be credited to VP Mike Pence. It was clear that at times Kamala Harris was off her game as her normal attempts at being emotional and histrionic were diffused by the unflappably low-key demeanor of the vice president; Pence was such a calm presence that he could have made a person taking Ambien appear to have attention deficit disorder. That is not to say that Harris also received her share of help from the front desk.
The moderator for the VP debate was Susan Page, and while she managed to exhibit far better control over the setting she was also regarded as tipping her hand with favoritism towards Harris. Susan seemed far more militant with the time for Pence remarks and more lenient with Harris. By the end those measuring for time have noted that the senator came away with notably more minutes of speaking time. This is hardly a surprising result considering Ms. Page has an upcoming biography she wrote on Nancy Pelosi.
Yet as unimaginable it might feel there could be an even more biased name set for the podium in the next presidential debate. Set to take place in Miami, the second debate was set for this coming week, but that has been thrown into limbo with Trump’s Covid diagnosis. Should the meeting play out it will be presided over by C-SPAN editor Steve Scully. While many might regard a moderator from the D.C. broadcaster to be a fair selection there are a few eyebrow-raising elements to consider.
The first being that Scully is a longtime acquaintance of Joe Biden, both personally and professionally. Scully kicked off his political career as an intern with Joe Biden as a senator. He has also promoted editorials from harsh anti-Trump sources and has been known to post pictures of himself socializing with Biden. Much of this could have been attempted to be excused away, simply stating that Scully is a respected name and his work eclipses any perceived bias found in his resume, except for his most recent actions on social media.
In a display of possible ignorance as to how direct messages work, Scully appears to have openly petitioned for advice from one-time White House operative and current Trump opposition figure, Anthony Scarmucci. In a deleted tweet Scully asks him directly how he should respond to a comment made by the president.
Once he realized how bad the optics were for this type of exchange, just ahead of his assigned duties, Scully deleted his query directed to the man behind the anti-Trump outfit Right Side PAC. The blowback must have been intense because next Scully went so far as to shut down his account entirely. (He has since reinstated the account, with the tweet removed.)
The main issue on the radar for the moment is whether the Miami event will even take place. Joe Biden has called for a Covid-infected Trump to be dismissed entirely from the proceedings, the debate commission is commanding that a virtual contest be held, and President Trump has said he will not participate in a digital-style debate. With all of that drama aswirl Steve Scully may actually be rooting for a complete cancellation, so he manages to avoid getting dragged down to Wallace-Page levels of scorn as a result of his partisan activity.
Would never see tucker, hannity, laura or judge jeanine
Walker is the worst of them all.
Is there even going to be a next debate?
If there is Biden will have to hold it with himself, because President Trump said he wouldn’t attend.
I know the second debate is off. Has Trump said he wouldn’t participate in what would have been the third one?
Biden can easily take both sides of any argument. He would provide an ideal debate, reflecting many different sides any given political discussion.
I second the motion.
"Gee,Mr Moderator,you ask me to denounce,yet *again*,white supremacists but you don't ask my opponent to denounce those tossing firebombs in Democrat cities like Portland.Is that because you still admire your old boss?"
Or "Gee,Mr Moderator,you ask me why I called dead soldiers "suckers" yet you fail to ask my opponent to denounce Jane Fonda's comment that the Wuhan Flu is a gift from God.Is that out of respect for your former boos?"
In a polarized nation, there is no unbiased moderator
Thus, moderation is not possible, especially not from a media radical who considers themselves the equal of the debaters
Of course. Look who's selecting these "moderators"!
The next debate should be a place and time of the President’s choosing.
The president had two hours on Rush where he took questions. He had a national town hall that can never be duplicated by Democrat.
There is no need for a fake town hall debate.
Mark Steyn had a great suggestion: Have a debate where Rush asks Biden the questions and the dems can pick their person to question Trump.
I'm waiting for the Biden campaign to whine that Biden needs equal time on the EIB.
Ya, right. ;)
The question that needs to be asked is why does the President and the RNC agree to debate forums and modertors that are not neutral and objective, i.e., debate forums and modertors always favor the democrats. Chris Wallace is a prime example. President Trump was right when he told Wallace (paraphrase), "I'm debating you."
When is the republican party going to insist on having a truly neutral debate moderator and replace the current pro-democrat debate commission with one that's apolitical? If we can't have a neutral playing field, then we need to just say "no debate" and explain to the American people the reason.
Ted and Johnny Jones would be a great pair.
The Presidential Debate Commission can easily transition to Pelosi’s 25th Amendment Commission in their down time...
The Democrats would squirm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.