Doesn’t that depend upon what is said in the emails?
You’re right about the fact that the interesting thing about the 33K emails is the fact that they were deleted.
However, because they were deleted, they might have other interesting value. They were deleted for a reason. I’m betting they weren’t all about yoga and wedding plans :)
The point of the emails is that they were deleted. Tampering with evidence is a crime. The emails themselves are not the point."
Probably not. They were probably deleted because they were incriminating to H. Clinton and B. Obama. Perhaps J.Biden will be caught in the swirl as the toilet flushes.
We don’t know what’s in them yet. They might very well be the point. Why did Hillary (1) set up a private server, to evade FOIA laws, and (2) delete the emails, even while they were under a direct Congressional preservation order? In light of that, it seems unlikely they’re about her yoga classes.
By way of example, now that we know she arranged the Russian collusion hoax, might there be an email or two (or a thousand) on that topic? Which, incidentally, could conclusively prove treason on her part?
Well....then why were they deleted?
They will probably be all about Chelsea’s wedding.
“The point of the emails is that they were deleted. Tampering with evidence is a crime. The emails themselves are not the point.”
You’re right and wrong. Sure it’s a crime to delete them but if those emails contain classified information the release of which is harmful to out interests then that would add to the crime already committed.
“The emails themselves are not the point.”
If he’s elected, we’ll all hang.
There was a reason she said that.
Hillary herself they were all about boring stuff like yoga classes and her daughter’s wedding plans. And if its one thing we know about the Clintons, their word is as good as gold.