Doesn’t that depend upon what is said in the emails?
“Doesn’t that depend upon what is said in the emails?”
No, not at all, that she had highly classified emails on an unauthorized and totally unprotected private server is a crime but the big one is that she “scrubbed” it and destroyed evidence.
That is straight up Obstruction of Justice. Because she communicated with others about it and others had an active part in deleting/destroying the evidence, there is also a “conspiracy to commit Obstruction of Justice” in here too.
If DOJ has any balls it goes forward for prosecution.
“Doesn’t that depend upon what is said in the emails?”
Absolutely not! The private account was illegal. The server located in the bathroom was illegal.
This so pisses me off when I think of how DH had to toe the line for decades in his T.S.- and Q-clearance career. The people at the top making the rules that could have ruined his life for the SLIGHTEST infraction are the ones breaking every blessed law.
“Doesn’t that depend upon what is said in the emails?”
All they need is one email that relates to business and Hillary is screwed. It would be a felony for each email.
This should be interesting.
What was said in the emails is relevant to whatever crime it reveals.