Posted on 10/08/2020 9:27:15 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Democrat strategist James Carville said Wednesday on MSNBC after the vice-presidential debate that Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) repeatedly objecting to being “lectured” by Vice President Mike Pence really hit “home” with women.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Her entire performance was canned lines. In fairness Pence's you are entitled to your own opinion not your own facts line was also canned. Pence used it twice and it sounded like scrapings from the bottom of the can the second time.
But to answer the contention above, no thinking women were impressed by Harris s giggling and canned lines and fake outrage.
Right, Kamala Harris freaked out saying “Don’t lecture me” to trigger those emotions. But Vice President Pence didn’t lecture her - he just pointed out her record. No doubt Harris practiced that whole lecture speech many times and just triggered it toward the end when it became obvious Pence wasn’t going to lecture her.
Of course, planned all along. Except Harris was too stupid to use it properly and actually said it when Pence wasn't saying a word.
To Harris- If you are running for vice president, then yes, you will be lectured because you are so far off the path you need to be corrected-
Whether you are a man or woman- running for office like you are opens you up to being corrected when you flat out lie, or are too uninformed to cite actual facts-
If you can’t handle it, resign- You know full well harris, that you WILL lecture pence every chance you get- if you dish it out- expect the same in return- or resign- we’re tired of your whining
I’m not surprised by this. Since the late 1980’s, this has been the MO used by many Dem women running for higher office.
It really started with Ann Richards of Texas and has grown since then. The MO is this:
It is perfectly OK to attack a man or say just about anything they want. But when the man replies, he’s being rude, chauvinistic and lecturing.
I knew Harris would do this last night. it was just a matter of what point in the debate she’d use it.
Really? Because she was being ripped on social media by other women.
Carville, it’s over. Nancy’s attempt to “talk” about the 25th amendment tomorrow in the House is a clear “tell.” You’ve already lost the election and you know it.
And Carville coached her on it and was upset when it wasn't getting the attention it deserved so he had to shed more light on this fake phony planned comeback.
So answering a question is being lectured too?
Good to know, not really, just more stupid to add to 2020.
“It hit home - every man was reminded of that nagging woman in their lives.”
Indeed, ubiquitous eye rolling, looks of condescension, and the never ending resting bitch-face when Pence was responding in his oh-so calm and cool manner..
Huge turnoff!
Didn’t hit home with me. I thought she sounded like a whiner female who can’t hack it and didn’t have her facts straight.
*yes, I’m female.
Apparently the public is viewing this much different than Carvile claims.
People hate to be lectured in general. By anybody.
Not this woman
I was glad to learn from Kamala that a debt is when you owe someone something!! Oh yea and foreign policy is about “relationships” es, she’s an expert on that, ha Willey?
Don’t lecture me...
I won’t condemn you. Your own actions already have.
This
That
The other...
Just list them off and let her remain pompous throughout.
She’s done...
Yes and she explained what a bounty was too.
She’s incredibly smart.
But it was the tax discussion that most are still talking about on the texting front today. "We won't raise taxes on those making less than $400k ..." ... didn't match well with "I will repeal the Trump tax cuts" ... which they know Biden is promising.
That was the aha moment for most people in the room.
Wait until the Supreme Court hearing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.