Hot diggity.
Though WE already knew this was the case. Nice that it is finally released to the public at large. Question is what are they gonna do about it?
Now will they be prosecuted!
The 2016 election has always reminded me of Star Trek 5 The Final Frontier where Captain Kirk asks the entity “What does God need with a starship?”. Rage and lghtening bolts ensue. Imagine Trump asking “What does God need with the Presidency?”. A bigger than life Hillary starts by throwing lightening bolts at the Trumpster, then at the American public, nonstop for four years.
So when are the arrests?
I don't know who's going to prison or all that political bullsht, but this is the historical proof that Trump was subject to a coup attempt by the Democratic nominee running against and the outgoing Obama/Biden Administration used the intelligence services to try to destroy his presidency.
They may or may not escape prosecution, that's the political part. The historical battle is over. Obama/Biden was the single most corrupt administration in the history of our country.
And Brennan, Strzok and Comey will go to prison, for starters.
Wake me when someone gets perp walked.
Bkmrk
Now we know why Biden is candidate, falling on the sword
Need there be any more proof to the fact that whatever they accuse you of is what they are guilty of?
NEED THERE BE?
so Graham actually delivered something?!?!?
Here’s the first defensive attempt:
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
·
45m
“I’m still wrapping my head around the idea that DNI just publicly released what it acknowledges in untested 2016 Russian intelligence chatter to raise derogatory questions about Hillary Clinton — which of course was Russia’s goal when it was doing the chattering.”
So Mr. Cheney is claiming that the memo supports the idea that the Russians were going after Hillary, i.e., supporting Trump. I see this as a reasonable attempt at a defense, frankly.
But then Undercover Huber says:
“Okay so the intel that Clinton was trying to smear Trump with the Russian DNC hacking might be “false” or “exaggerated” except
a) Brennan personally briefed Obama on it (why if false?)
b) That smear actually happened. Clinton hired Fusion GPS, who did smear Trump with DNC hacks
Undercover Huber
@JohnWHuber
·
1m
As a bonus, this appears to have been real intelligence information which came in BEFORE the opening of Crossfire Hurricane and no one at the FBI opened a case on Clinton...
...but then a few days later opened Crossfire on Trump based on zero official intelligence!” (End of his reply)
Seems like a reasonable counterargument to me. I would just add that not only was there zero official intel that Trump should be investigated, but there was actually intel that he was being set up by Hillary. And still they did what they did?
Hopefully, there’s a whole lot more to come out before election day. And shouldn’t some WashPost and NYTimes reporters lose their jobs for running with anonymous sources who now appear to have been outright liars? And their bosses as well, for allowing those stories to appear?
I don’t see any linkable source, do you have one?
HilLIARy PAID FOR the Russian dossier...
And she never complained about being given fake data... I wonder why?
Watergate on steroids!
“The IC
DOES NOT KNOW THE ACCURACY
of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication”
Trump needs to reference this REPEATEDLY tonight.
“Joe, you were briefed on this. Why, as a public servant, didn’t you say anything about it? If you didn’t, why should anyone trust you to do the right thing as President? If you did, where’s the evidence?