[Skywise]

No - you don’t take away the police and then you’ll get around to “reimagining” it.

This is a Republic. You submit the plan to the public and we vote on it - you stupid communist twit.

[rightwingcrazy]

I wonder if she plans to “reimagine” her personal security detail?

[lightman]

Nothing to “reimagine”.

Second Amendment....nationwide CCW by RIGHT, not permit.

An armed society is a polite society.

And tear down those “no weapons” and “face covering required” signs!

[clearcarbon]

"But Kamala Harris says all we have to do is just “reimagine public safety” in order to keep our children and communities safe."

Harris in Wonderland.

[jdsteel]

Let’s reimagine your political career, Kneepads.

[capydick]

Using the same logic I’d like to reimagine the Democrat party to keep our country safe - can we do that?

[lurk]

Re imagine. It’s the new word to say. It has no design or purpose, just a circle of sensitive souls in a lotus position, sending vibes.

[metmom]

“It is outdated, it is wrong-headed thinking to think that the only way you’re gonna get communities to be safe is to put more police officers on the street,” Harris said. “What we have to do and what we will do is reimagine public safety.”

SO if we imagine they are really safe when they are not, then that will make them safer?

Au contraire, more police and concealed carry, not to mention actually locking up criminals instead of releasing them on the public, will make them safer.

Will you pay for my own armed personal bodyguards for protection, just like you have?

[beethovenfan]

What an idiot.

[coloradan]

Imagine all the public safety ...

[TomGuy]

what we will do is reimagine public safety

More Lib feelgoodism.

Reimagine probably means redefining what crimes are. We already know that these Libs/Dems no longer consider shoplifting and pilfering and damaging property, etc., as crimes, since they give the perps a pass.

Likely their reimagining will be similar to what they have done with the schools -- dumbing down students to make them all feel more equal.

[MHGinTN]

And with stupid assertions like this we know why she had to be a ‘heels up ho’ to get ahead in Leftafornia. The people of New York KNOW she is a fool because they are experiencing few police on the streets ... and it isn’t pretty.

[know.your.why]

So...She wants imaginary safety? Is that what she’s saying?

[Mr Ramsbotham]

How about we ban antibiotics and then re-imagine treatment for bacterial disease?

[Paladin2]

Let Camel get some White Privilege rubbed off from her husband and live in a gated community with SS protection.

Life’s easy for the ‘Rat elite.

[Dead Corpse]

She’s part right. Decriminalize self defense and self defense tools.

Let the Law abiding take out the trash.

[DoughtyOne]

Let’s reimagine her outside of government.

[tcrlaf]

You can imagine that your safe while being beaten for your wallet, or having your home and business robbed!

ABSOLUTELY GENIUS!
George Orwell couldn’t have come up with a better description for it!

[lapsus calami]

 

 

 

 

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Lets apply some logic here.

If "more police officers on the streets won’t make communities safer" is true, then "less police officers on the streets will make communities safer" must be false.

But that second clause is demonstrably and provably false given the crime stats in 2020, ergo the first clause must be false.

In other words, she is a complete idiot.