Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2020 8:54:38 AM PDT by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: karpov

To “make justice bigger” can only mean to make government bigger.

And government is too big already.


2 posted on 09/22/2020 8:58:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

You’re confused. Liberals can legislate from the bench, conservatives cannot.
Understand?


4 posted on 09/22/2020 8:59:30 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
She wanted to make law, but knew she could never get elected (or didn't want to endure the hard work and messiness associated with elected office).

So, she cheated.

7 posted on 09/22/2020 9:01:37 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

exactly


10 posted on 09/22/2020 9:05:25 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Good points. There would not be the battles over abortion that we’ve been having if the issue had been addressed in the State legislatures. The invention of law by judges is transitory. It can be reversed at any time.

The USSC should be determining matters of law. If they want to beat a drum for injustice there are plenty of examples. Like the 5 year prison sentences for storing Weed-B-Gon wrongly. There’s plenty of cruel and unusual penalties passed by legislatures every year. Any American commits at least two felonies every day unknowingly thanks to the overreach of State and Federal lawmakers. Maybe the USSC could address those issues rather than carrying water for Parties that can’t get their per legislation passed and signed.


11 posted on 09/22/2020 9:05:41 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

They can’t get underground fast enough to suit me....27 years of stupid is enough!!!


12 posted on 09/22/2020 9:06:15 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Great article!


15 posted on 09/22/2020 9:09:39 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Article is a refreshing contrast to Republicans’ usual compulsion to say nice things about leftist jurists who have spent years demolishing America from the bench. They did the same thing when Thurgood Marshall died. These jurists had their good qualities, but the damage they did should not be swept under the rug.


20 posted on 09/22/2020 9:25:06 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adical Islam,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Didn’t Understand Her Job. If RBG wanted to be a lawmaker, she should have run for Congress.

Sadly, you can say that of many of our jurists.

21 posted on 09/22/2020 9:25:33 AM PDT by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Great line from the author.

“Handing out indictments for hypocrisy in Washington is like writing up people in New Orleans at Mardi Gras for public intoxication.”


22 posted on 09/22/2020 9:41:33 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
Good article, with a quibble about the title.

Justice Ginsburg didn't fail to understand her job; she refused to do her job.

23 posted on 09/22/2020 9:48:35 AM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

She sure as hell DID understand her job. She’s a leftist. She understood along with all leftist apparatchiks that their leftist agenda cannot be enacted legislatively. For the pas 60 years they have used the courts to legislate, contrary to the constitution (what constitution?).

So yeah, she understood her job. And she did it as well as any. And even though she died during Rosh Hashanah, I wouldn’t give you 2 cents for her chances in the hereafter.


25 posted on 09/22/2020 9:57:00 AM PDT by Migraine ( Liberalism is great (until it happens to YOU).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

McConnell needs to get this done....if he fails, R-party will cease to exist.

And it needs to be before the election, because if Trump loses and/or Rs lose the Senate, the usual cast of RINO losers will cave and agree it should wait for the Admin and/or Senate.

what they need to do, is confirm the nominee of course, then if they do lose the Senate, use the lame duck session to restore the filibuster rule back. Require 70 senators for cloture.

then tell Schumer to pack-this.


28 posted on 09/22/2020 10:09:36 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

I imagine she wanted to maximize her power and prestige—and she did.


29 posted on 09/22/2020 10:11:57 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Oh, she understood her job. And she did it exactly as the democrat party wrote the job description.


30 posted on 09/22/2020 10:12:10 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov
In a nut shell, the job of a SCJ is to determine, in their view, if a law is constructional. It is the in their view part of that statement that is problematic, as for some, any view will do.
31 posted on 09/22/2020 10:12:51 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Not really fair to pin that on her.

They ALL think that way.


32 posted on 09/22/2020 10:15:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

Ruth who?


33 posted on 09/22/2020 10:45:51 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

I like what Justice Scalia said and how he avoided judicial activism.

“The truth is that the judge who looks outside the Constitution always looks inside himself and nowhere else.” And the more you look outside the law, the less you protect Americans’ freedoms.


37 posted on 09/23/2020 2:34:22 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: karpov

bmp


38 posted on 09/23/2020 2:39:51 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson