Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Didn’t Understand Her Job. If RBG wanted to be a lawmaker, she should have run for Congress.
National Review ^ | September 22, 2020 | Kevin D. Williamson

Posted on 09/22/2020 8:54:38 AM PDT by karpov

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: karpov
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Didn’t Understand Her Job. If RBG wanted to be a lawmaker, she should have run for Congress.

Sadly, you can say that of many of our jurists.

21 posted on 09/22/2020 9:25:33 AM PDT by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Great line from the author.

“Handing out indictments for hypocrisy in Washington is like writing up people in New Orleans at Mardi Gras for public intoxication.”


22 posted on 09/22/2020 9:41:33 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Good article, with a quibble about the title.

Justice Ginsburg didn't fail to understand her job; she refused to do her job.

23 posted on 09/22/2020 9:48:35 AM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

All the more reason to nullify RvW.....RBG knew it was racist from the getgo.....as was the harridan, Margaret Sanger.


24 posted on 09/22/2020 9:54:28 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: karpov

She sure as hell DID understand her job. She’s a leftist. She understood along with all leftist apparatchiks that their leftist agenda cannot be enacted legislatively. For the pas 60 years they have used the courts to legislate, contrary to the constitution (what constitution?).

So yeah, she understood her job. And she did it as well as any. And even though she died during Rosh Hashanah, I wouldn’t give you 2 cents for her chances in the hereafter.


25 posted on 09/22/2020 9:57:00 AM PDT by Migraine ( Liberalism is great (until it happens to YOU).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

Right about now she is getting a just review on just exactly how millions of babies had their lives terminated and she was lucky enough to make it for 87 years living in the lap of luxury.


26 posted on 09/22/2020 10:06:27 AM PDT by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

- United States Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, quoted in Emily Bazelon, “The Place of Women on the Court”Adobe Acrobat file, The New York Times Magazine, July 7, 2009.


Ginsberg was a racist and thus it is no wonder that she was so revered by the party of the Ku Klux Klan.


27 posted on 09/22/2020 10:09:06 AM PDT by angry elephant (Ding dong the Witch is dead, the Wicked Witch is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: karpov

McConnell needs to get this done....if he fails, R-party will cease to exist.

And it needs to be before the election, because if Trump loses and/or Rs lose the Senate, the usual cast of RINO losers will cave and agree it should wait for the Admin and/or Senate.

what they need to do, is confirm the nominee of course, then if they do lose the Senate, use the lame duck session to restore the filibuster rule back. Require 70 senators for cloture.

then tell Schumer to pack-this.


28 posted on 09/22/2020 10:09:36 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I imagine she wanted to maximize her power and prestige—and she did.


29 posted on 09/22/2020 10:11:57 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Oh, she understood her job. And she did it exactly as the democrat party wrote the job description.


30 posted on 09/22/2020 10:12:10 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
In a nut shell, the job of a SCJ is to determine, in their view, if a law is constructional. It is the in their view part of that statement that is problematic, as for some, any view will do.
31 posted on 09/22/2020 10:12:51 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Not really fair to pin that on her.

They ALL think that way.


32 posted on 09/22/2020 10:15:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Ruth who?


33 posted on 09/22/2020 10:45:51 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Irony in this comment considering her Jewish roots


34 posted on 09/22/2020 11:08:47 AM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
Oh, she understood her job. And she did it exactly as the democrat party wrote the job description.

Absolutely. A dem judge's job is to get things done that elected lawmakers cannot. SCOTUS can declare it and it's done, and nobody can do a damned thing about it short of a constitutional amendment. One SCOTUS justice is worth more than a hundred congressional seats because they can advance their disastrous and unpopular agenda without consequences or any chance to overturn it ever.

35 posted on 09/22/2020 11:18:18 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

There is only power, and the will to use it.


36 posted on 09/22/2020 11:30:52 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I like what Justice Scalia said and how he avoided judicial activism.

“The truth is that the judge who looks outside the Constitution always looks inside himself and nowhere else.” And the more you look outside the law, the less you protect Americans’ freedoms.


37 posted on 09/23/2020 2:34:22 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

bmp


38 posted on 09/23/2020 2:39:51 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse

OK, now that’s funny!


39 posted on 09/23/2020 7:37:11 PM PDT by jackibutterfly (My mind is wandering, and I'm following it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Justice Ginsburg’s using her position to try to impose a feminist vision on federal policy ought to be recognized for what it was: an abuse of power. If you want to rewrite the law along feminist lines, that’s a perfectly honorable project — run for Congress.

That's it in a nutshell.

40 posted on 09/27/2020 7:01:14 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson