Posted on 09/18/2020 10:35:25 PM PDT by White Lives Matter
Former President Barack Obama issued a statement late Friday night on the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The statement was posted to the online site Medium.
In the statement, Obama demanded the Republican controlled Senate not vote on any replacement for Ginsburg until a new president is sworn following the November presidential election. Obama cited his failed 2016 nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to back up his support for Ginsburgs reported dying instructions that her replacement be nominated by a new president (My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.)
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Good catch!
Yes, that sounds so Marxist. We elect our leaders, not "install" them. A little peek into the Marxist mind of RGB.
Ginsburg herself said the President doesnt stop being the President because theres an election.
If Obama said this..you can bet Trump will do the opposite.
Hammer Amy in !
Screw her dying ‘instructions’.
She clung to her post until the last possible ,dying, moment .
Her time us past . Trump should nominate a new FEMALE tomorrow.
Rush to confirm HER .
To help counter the upcoming Cinstitutional crisis they are plotting
to launch
And while he’s at it , announce the indictment and ARREST of Obama.
Charge : TREASON and coup plotting subversion .
That bastard must pay.....in spades....
I’ve read my US Constitution top to bottom many times, but I’ve never seen the section on granting wishes to dying Supreme Court justices.
I try very hard to wish no one ill will, and to never dance on anyone’s grave. Justice Ginsburg is gone now, and we have a lawful process by which to replace her position on the Supreme Court. That starts with the President of the United States nominating someone, and the Senate holding confirmation hearings and a vote on that nominee. The President is Donald Trump. Liberals need to get over it and accept that fact. There is no special exception for “but she was a liberal and his nominee won’t be!”
Go spoon with your manwife, Barry.
So tired of skuzzball liberals dictating everything.
She was absent for much of the last 3 years.
The Dems made a calculated risk, Ginsburg made a calculated risk - and they made a bad calculation.
You have to live with your bad calculations. Roberts shouldve forced the issue long ago, instead of letting her clerks run everything.
With all the special rules for her, and Biden in charge of curing Cancer, she couldnt make it to the next Dem Administration.
And had the seat on the Supreme Court been Ginsburg's property, we would.
But it wasn't.
Well, Ruthie the purported Jew (although the murderer of millions of babies) hung on so that here replacement could be appointed by a Christian instead of the former Muslim.
Either God’s or Ruthie’s choice on how that went.
Now why would Jill Biden do that to become a powerless nobody when she could be the next Edith Wilson?
I love it when Democrats act crazy
Does Obama think he’s now the rudder for his party because it’s leaders are such utter failures?......or is He just ignoring the expectation of the preceding president keeping mute doesn’t apply to him?
He’s become a more self-righteous, sanctimonious, narcissistic jerk than when he held the office!
“Pay no attention to that man.”
There is a problem of consistency here. Joe Biden first killed a Supreme nomination in an election year. The repubs did it back to Garland based on the Biden precedent. Now it seems they are scrapping that precedent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.