Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/10/2020 7:55:34 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; ..

P


2 posted on 09/10/2020 7:55:47 PM PDT by bitt (Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

He’s afraid it will be used to lock up all his voters.


4 posted on 09/10/2020 7:57:29 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

So they don’t want to know who is looting and destroying their city?

Who would ever want to live in a city that sides with the thugs rather than the citizens.


5 posted on 09/10/2020 8:00:50 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Has no impact on County, State or Federal use.


6 posted on 09/10/2020 8:00:56 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Portland. Seattle. ChiCongo. NYC. Austin.

Narcissistic Marxist anti American cesspools and blights upon the country. Past time for the Feds to clean house.

7 posted on 09/10/2020 8:02:22 PM PDT by LouAvul (The wheels of America are coming off and the media have stolen the lug nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Will this legislation outlaw the IPhone Facial Reconition Unlock feature?


8 posted on 09/10/2020 8:04:06 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

I bet Portland will be the first sanctuary city for wildfire arsonists, too.


9 posted on 09/10/2020 8:04:39 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

What, exactly, is this dipstick mayor’s endgame plan?


13 posted on 09/10/2020 8:16:10 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Too bad for them they can’t stop this no matter how hard they try!


15 posted on 09/10/2020 8:17:38 PM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Wouldn’t want to identify any rioters.

Does this affect Federal use?
Or use of anyone outside Portland on video coming out of Portland.

I’m guessing no.


16 posted on 09/10/2020 8:20:08 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Not going to get the toothpaste back in the tube. The Portland ban is a meaningless gesture.


17 posted on 09/10/2020 8:31:37 PM PDT by Natty Bumppo@frontier.net (We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Wheeler’s providing aid and comfort to the Nation’s domestic enemies.


19 posted on 09/10/2020 8:37:48 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

They actually are protecting their criminals against the populace. Can you spell I-N-S-A-N-E? This action makes Biden look like Einstein in comparison.


22 posted on 09/10/2020 8:50:11 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

government needs to stfu about tools that also help the victim/innocent against the attacker/gulity


25 posted on 09/10/2020 9:25:36 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

So was one of the unstated purposes of the face-diaper mandates to render face-recognition technology essentially useless, making it politically easier to ban it?

Or to fuel the growth of high-def/long distance iris scanning?


28 posted on 09/10/2020 9:46:08 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

I do not see how a city ordinace which attempts to restrict how a business uses their 1st amendment right to record on and from their own private property, could stand up to legal scrutiny. Yes the city can ban the practice for their own property, I just dont see it being enforceable against a business.


29 posted on 09/10/2020 10:08:20 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - Dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

How they gonna know?


30 posted on 09/11/2020 5:02:20 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

““Technology exists to make our lives easier, not for public and private entities to use as a weapon against the very citizens they serve and accommodate,” the Democratic mayor reportedly said...............Is he referring to the criminal element being sufficiently able to resist identification? Seems that way to me.


31 posted on 09/11/2020 8:38:12 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson