The "man" from NAMBLA.
Posted on 09/03/2020 8:36:29 AM PDT by mplc51
According to SB 145, the legislation “would exempt from mandatory registration” as a sex offender “a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.”
The measure would allow a judge to decide if an adult who engages in oral or anal sex with a child must register as a sex offender if that person is within ten years of the age of the victim.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
When it comes to sex, there is no such thing as a “consenting child”. Age of consent is written into law for a reason.
Now various venues may determine that the age of consent occurs at different significant events in life, and it does, but the rules and case law that have built up around what is appropriate and what is not have been based pretty much on some amorphous definition of “maturity”, which means different things to different people. Is the age upon which the child may be capable of reproduction? Not all people are able to reproduce, some never will. It is the age at which the child may declare “emancipation”? Again, there are several things that argue the child is not fully mature in many ways.
A child of three years, or ten, or even sixteen, does not yet have enough life experience to give informed consent.
Precocious does not equal mature.
This might be the California version of a "Romeo and Juliet" exception where older teenagers who consensually engage in sexual activity are not held to the same standard as child predators (teachers, coaches, parents, aunts, uncles). I assume age of consent is still 18 in California. In many states it's 16.
“willing”
Welcome to Pedofornia, you will now surrender your children.
“So, how many of the congress critters in cali are members of ‘nambla’?”
I’m betting shifty Schiff. Any takers?
Exactly. I think they try to “sell” the concept with the idea of a 26-year-old and a 16-year-old, or something. Wrong, of course, but at least some people might say “I get it”.
But the reality is what you point out — 15 and 5, 20 and 10, etc.
Sick. And clearly this is aimed at homosexuals who like ‘em young.
Sure, let’s perpetuate a common stereotype about gay men IN LEGISLATION!!!
Neither should be granted leniency. 10 years is way too large for a “Romeo and Juliet” exception.
But that's what the homosexual movement has been about....the ability to have sex with underage children.
It is a sick and depraved mind.
A child of three years, or ten, or even sixteen, does not yet have enough life experience to give informed consent.
____________________________________________________
I’ll buy the first two age groups, but a person can get married in Alabama at 16 with parental consent (and if they have been emancipated). There may be a few other hoops they have to jump through.
Here in Georgia it used to be 16 with parental consent, but now it’s up to 17.
“Why just oral and anal? Gay agenda?”
**************************************
Most definitely appears that way.
The faggot rep claims this is to end discrimination against alphabet children. BS. They want freedom to diddle children. I say they and all other alphabet people should be passionately discriminated against. Queer behavior should not be tolerated in normal society. Queers who molest children should be dealt with in the harshest manner. If you think I’m harsh and want to look for the silver lining, think that the perp will look back on the worst man could do to him as a pleasant Sunday picnic compared to what he will experience in the hereafter.
Aw, gee that’s a shame Rosenbaum the Pedophile that attacked Rittenhouse for which he was subsequently shot (though not proven it was Rittenhouse) was unable to take advantage of California SB 145 before his demise.
“Where are we going and why am I in this hand basket”?
With all due respect to our CA FReepers, all the beautiful scenery/weather in the world simply ain’t worth it.
/.02
Harvey Milk is smiling up to us from hell.
Because Weiner, the author of the bill, can suck start a leaf blower. It would never occur to him to include those ucky breeder things.
The "man" from NAMBLA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.