California Legislature Passes Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, Anal Sex with Willing Children

Breitbart ^ | 09/03/2020 | Susan Berry

[null and void]

So they can have sexual relations with children as long as a child says yes?

Only oral and anal as long as the kid says yes...

[9YearLurker]

Well, that of course makes all the difference. Phew!

[Truthoverpower]

For generations homosexuality male homosexuality was classified as a mental illness

In the 1970s it was removed from the DSM in the status and they’ve been pushing ever cents to normalize homosexuality

Having witnessed the San Francisco community for upwards of 40 years now I can tell you that the activist male homosexual obsess is absolutely obsessed with youth. The young adolescent male form

San Francisco named in entire wing of its multibillion dollar airport after Harvey milk who is assassinated with George Moscone in 1978 by a disgruntled employee Dan white

In their giant posters on the wall of Mr. milks life and becoming the first openly gay Congress critter Local in 1978 they paint a very favorable picture of him and the gay rights movement of the 1970s

What they don’t tell you about milk and most other adult male homosexuals is that they’re completely obsessed with boys aged 12 to 16

This is what I did in the Boy Scouts as a great mentoring organization for young men it got taken over by many male homosexuals who only joined as a scoutmaster in order to pray upon these young man

I will insert loudly and clearly hear that this bill is only about male homosexuality and has nothing whatsoever to do with females either male female or female female sexual relations

Just so you non-deranged regular people can understand what the push is here from San Fran Freako!

[null and void]

Well, maybe it’s the new chick attractant -— a lot easier than borrowing your sister’s 8 month old baby, or new puppy.

It's better than a puppy or an 8 month old baby.

You attract women of all stripes with a puppy or a baby.

The MAGA hat automatically weeds out the undesirable ones!

[Pajamajan]

"Newsom still has to sign it..."

Is there any reason he wouldn't sign it?

The Democrat party would love to legalize pedophilia.

[halfright]

I wear my Trump hat and shirt everywhere...cant tell you how many babes have complimented me on my choice of Hat, etc. Babes of all ages. Babe Magnet!! Whizzes off my beloved wife though. She laughs

[Flaming Conservative]

That’s true. Unless, of course, you attract some screeching democrat harpy for the wrong reason...

[DPMD]

Everyone knows that, with pedophiles, all children are “willing.” There must be more pedophiles in the CA legislature than anyone ever thought. If one had to guess which city was represented by the greatest number, SFR would win hands down.

[Varda]

It’s homosexuals. These laws have in mind that it’s statistically NORMAL for homosexuals to pursue minors for sex.

[jazminerose]

*Willing children* = oxymoron.

A *child* under 18 cannot consent to *anything* in California. If a child under 18 tries to enter a contract, it is legally voidable.

California needs to go soft on pedophiles to support the entertainment industry.

The law has long recognized that minors simply lack the capacity to understand the potential consequences of their consents.

Thus, a 16 year old buying a car without a parent’s consent is unacceptable and easily understood. But, a 14 year old consenting to anal sex with an adult is in the minor’s interest and of no concern?

A very dangerous precedent and another camel’s nose nightmare scenario.

[null and void]

You have those in Oklahoma?

[null and void]

Maybe you could carry a spare blue hat embroidered with:”Warning! Biden Voter” to give her to mollify her?

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[rrrod]

Damn them to hell.

[dfwgator]

Further along the road to hell.

This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway.

[Magnatron]

...if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor...

So a 21 year old is okay with an 11 year old?

I know what reaction mine would be if it was my kid. And it wouldn’t be quantified by this law...

[Flaming Conservative]

Haha! What are you thinking? Crazy democrat women will not be mollified! ;)

[null and void]

Tell me about it. I was married to one.

[null and void]

Really.

I did know she had spent a lot of time in mental institutions, but I thought it was always as staff.

It wasn’t.

[Flaming Conservative]

I’ve heard there’s a conclave of them down around OKC. If there’s any up here in the northeast, they must be camouflaged, because it’s always open season for them up here, and that makes ‘em real shy.