It's not just for Guns anymore !!
There are countries where the government controls all material things, and they also control the people.
Anyone that wishes to live under that kind of rule, is welcome to move to those countries. Why ruin a country where most everybody wants to own their ‘things’ and control their own personal lives? People left Europe and other places to come to America, simply because it’s government by the people, for the people, and of the people. What Teen Vogue advocates is completely opposite of what America means.
Soon after moving to a country that runs everything and controls everything, the people who believe like the Teen Vogue writers, would be looking to move right back to the U.S., just like virtually the whole world wants to move to the U.s.
It's not just for Guns anymore !!
“This is outright, raw Marxism.” Right and also unalloyed stupidity.
We used to have drinks with my friend’s co worker who was a city administrator. He was a minority and screaming Liberal, but tolerable.
One night he was complaining about something stolen from his office. I had to laugh, I said: “Well, if you understand property, then I guess there’s hope for you.”
He didn’t want to laugh, but he had to.
I not at all surprised... When the cops recently arrested 20 antifa hoods 13 of them were teachers from across the nation..
I don't think that was just a fluke.. I believe that is now the norm.. They have really whacked-up our kids and need to answer for it... :(
To shut up the fools at TEEN Vogue just take their cell phones and tablets.
No property rights, right?
-Elvis Costello
Somehow I don’t expect Vogue or its readers to advocate communal clothes closets. Or anti-fashion, government issued Mao suits.
I wonder how the readers of Teen Vogue would feel if some other teen girl could just walk into their room and help themselves to their makeup and wardrobe?
Teen Vogue: The teen girls’ guide to Marxism.
“Have these yuts not studied history at all???”
Yes, in college. Woke history.
Such as the Alcalde of Los Angeles, who is shutting off all utilities for his political opponents...
- You have a "right" to free healthcare, housing, cash, food, tuition, childcare, insurance, marijuana, and to murder your unborn (and even born) children.
- But you don't have a "right" to free speech, to defend your loved ones and property, to own a business free of government tyranny, or to worship God.
So they loaded up their truck and moved to Beverly, Beverly Hills that is, swimming pools, movie stars.
I think we should divest property from people advocating for this first, you know, as a test case.
the government has so indebted itself it requires rental payments from all to meet its obligations
the goal of the American Bolsheviks.
Nevertheless in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally
applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public
purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national
bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of
the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State: the
bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally
in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies,
especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries: gradual abolition
of all the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of
the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s
factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial
production, &c., &c.
When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and
all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole
nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so
called, is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another. If the
proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of
circumstances, to organise itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes
itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of
production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the
conditions for the existence of class antagonisms, and of classes generally, and will
thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.
In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we
shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for
the free development of all.
Private property for me, none for thee.
Hack the site. Steal their magazine
I am really getting sick and tired of of these loudmouthed naggers.
Need a return of HUAC.