Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU Sues to Get Illegal Aliens Counted in Congressional Apportionment
Breitbart ^ | July 24 2020 | JOHN BINDER

Posted on 07/25/2020 1:04:01 AM PDT by knighthawk

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is suing to have illegal aliens counted when apportioning congressional representation.

On Friday, the ACLU dropped a lawsuit against the Trump administration on behalf of a number of open borders lobbying groups — including New York Immigration Coalition, Make the Road New York, CASA, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, ADC Research Institute, and FIEL Houston — demanding that illegal aliens be counted in congressional apportionment.

This week, Trump signed a memorandum to exclude illegal aliens from being counted when the federal government apportions congressional representation to the states — a reversal of existing policy that allows states with large illegal populations to soak up more political power by counting all residents rather than legal residents.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclu; congressional; illegalaliens

1 posted on 07/25/2020 1:04:02 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

L8r


2 posted on 07/25/2020 1:11:43 AM PDT by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Calling John Roberts. Pick up the white courtesy phone!


3 posted on 07/25/2020 1:17:56 AM PDT by SanchoP (We're passed the biological softening up and beginning the open warfare strategy. WAKE UP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

RGB... Death calling on line 1


4 posted on 07/25/2020 1:19:05 AM PDT by Bullish (CNN is what happens when 8th graders run a cable network.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Who didn’t see that coming?
Does the ACLU even have legal standing on this?


5 posted on 07/25/2020 1:25:09 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Of course they are.


6 posted on 07/25/2020 1:25:41 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

We had a USSC case already on this but presented in a different way.


7 posted on 07/25/2020 1:46:53 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Sounds like they want to bring back something like the “three-fifths” rule. Rich coming from the ACLU.

Please, US Supreme Court, don’t give them what they want.


8 posted on 07/25/2020 2:07:57 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I really don’t understand the reasoning behind this. Illegals aren’t supposed to be able to vote; why should they be counted in this?


9 posted on 07/25/2020 2:17:51 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (In these trying times, "Give Me Liberty or Give me Death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

The Constitution directs a census must occur every ten years, but beyond that...it’s not exactly written down on ‘who’ you count or don’t count.

Since it revolves around representation and voting....you’d only assume that citizens would count.

The problem here...if you figure timing, this case won’t get to the Supreme Court until the fall of 2021. By that point, at least one vacancy (maybe two) will be existing on the Supreme Court, and Trump (figuring he wins) will appoint only pro-positions on this topic. So even if Roberts does figure to go against the idea....there will five on the right who agree with Trump.

At this point, NY, California and Texas figure to be the losers (figure two districts lost to each state), and a major fight on all three for the new districts being drawn. Then the more curious situation will be Latinos/Hispanics demonstrating in this election....that more of them are pro-Republican than people had figured. The next decade promises to be a very interesting period.


10 posted on 07/25/2020 2:29:05 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

You got to be kidding? The ACLU has really lost its way a long, long time ago.


11 posted on 07/25/2020 2:56:34 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

Needs to be bounty on some heads.


12 posted on 07/25/2020 2:58:17 AM PDT by NativeSon ( What Would Virginia Do? #WWVD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

They are at least 3/5ths worthy.


13 posted on 07/25/2020 3:00:01 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

“Does the ACLU even have legal standing on this?”

I would think at some point illegal aliens would have to appear in court. Which would be a good time for ICE to be waiting at the court house.


14 posted on 07/25/2020 6:17:54 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

This should be part of a Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement bill, missing since 1986 ONE TIME amnesty. Since that amnesty was granted already, a second amnesty is off the table. What remains is the enforcement the Democrats have disallowed since then.

The List of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, missing since 1986 goes like this -
1) southern barrier;
2) require eVerify to hire;
3) end all chain migration;
4) birthright per Minor v. Happersett (plural parents);
5) end work visas;
6) 10-year moratorium on all new applications for citizenship (40 years to allow workplace automation effects on downsizing population);
7) Set up an illegal aliens’ victim restitution fund.

Enactment of these provisions will motivate illegal aliens to SELF-deport, and remove colonizadors from our welfare rolls.

We need to pass these protections in order not to make out Democrats as liars who promised the protection in exchange for a ONE TIME AMNESTY. The Democrats got the amnesty already. Now its past time for the protections we were promised.


15 posted on 07/25/2020 6:57:37 AM PDT by RideForever (We were born to be tested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

California has a lot of people that can’t vote. (They’re not supposed to, anyway.) Many citizens have left California for other states. If you count non-citizens for Congressional representation, it becomes a lot harder for places like California to lose seats in the House when the demographics shift. That affects what legislation passes and dies in Congress.

The “three/fifths” rule in the Constitution allowed states to count three out of five of their indentured servants/slaves in the census for representative purposes. It gave the Souh padded representation in Congress until the Civil War ended it.


16 posted on 07/25/2020 7:12:25 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

don’t illegal aliens lack standing in legal cases?


17 posted on 07/25/2020 10:50:24 AM PDT by DilJective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson