Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Ex-Editor Calls Out Wikipedia for Its War Against Mark Levin
Newsbusters ^ | July 14, 2020 | Alexander Hall

Posted on 07/14/2020 6:52:01 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17

A former Wikipedia editor blasted Wikipedia for not being neutral, and slammed the platform for a multi-year scorched-earth campaign against popular conservative talk radio host Mark Levin.

A massive exposé accusing Wikipedia of having biased editors was put out by Breitbart News. “Localemediamonitor” and “Snooganssnoogans,” according to Breitbart, have been allowed to run rampant on conservative Wikipedia entries. That included their jihad against Levin.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: articles; editors; levin; wikipedia
The Left is using Wikipedia to attack The Great One.
1 posted on 07/14/2020 6:52:01 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Someone should already author an entire book on this lefty controlled “knowledge based” monopoly.


2 posted on 07/14/2020 6:53:36 PM PDT by Marinario
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

I usually catch at least the first 1/2 to Hr of Mark’s program driving to the Lake each night, he is on fire and spot on.


3 posted on 07/14/2020 6:54:19 PM PDT by Shady (It is the rule of law vs tyranny, plain and simple, and it is the fight of our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

When I was on college ten years ago, several of my instructors banned the use of Wikipedia as a source because it is so easily edited by anonymous people without research credentials or sources for their edits.

That should be the collegiate standard.


4 posted on 07/14/2020 7:25:47 PM PDT by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17; All

In political campaigns while the use of Social Electronic Formats are useful in presenting political positions. Relying solely on using those venues is a mistake because of their SEF content limitations and media bias .

Consideration of the use of reprinted material including handouts and flyers such as of articles in FR and the planning of area saturation distribution known as “blitzing” in the targeted area is essential of one wants to win.

DO IT LIKE THIS
Get News about corruption spiked by MSM
Presented and sourced in Free Republic. com/
An all sides news collecting site by volunteers
with no ads or fees which uses donations
below just a sample Punch up link for
http://www/freerepublic.com/

Burisma Paid Joe Biden $900,000 for Lobbying – Ukrainian MP
Ukraine News Agency ^ |KYIV. Oct 9 (Interfax-Ukraine) – Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden received $900,000 for lobbying activities from Burisma Group, Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada member Andriy Derkach said citing investigation materials the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. payment for consultative services,”;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3785536/posts

Obama gave Pearson Publishing $350 million to create Commoncore text and Pearson gave Obama a $65 million dollar book deal in return. Investment Watch ^ | 12/8/19 |The Obamas’ $60m book deal has broken all records. From James Patterson to JK Rowling and Pope John Paul II, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3805839/posts

Chelsea Clinton is worth big bucks — Here’s how she managed to make all that money Fox News ^ | 1/12/2020 | Tammy Bruce Posted on 1/12/2020, 3:33:01 PM New York Post reported back in 2015 an estimated net worth of $15 million Barron’s, revealed that Chelsea Clinton has now reaped $9 million in a corporate board position. In 2011, her mother was still secretary of state, she was appointed to IAC/, an Internet investment company. receives an annual $50,000 retainer and $250,000 worth of IAC stock , according to Barron’s .Politico reported she is rewarded with $600,000 a year doing occasional fluffy feature stories.. Vanity Fair found, after she parted ways with NBC News in 2014, she ended up making $26,724 per minute .http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3807636/posts


5 posted on 07/14/2020 7:27:58 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
I have become lukewarm for Levin because of his constant harangue against the South that borders on pathologic. He constantly misrepresents much of the Confederate heritage and boils it down to one issue without respect to the multitude of reasons the South wanted out. I have little sympathy on his tirade today about how the Jews are mistreated in history and yet he constantly attacks my Southern heritage. Once the left vilifies the Southerners they will turn on others without reason or facts as they have the South.
6 posted on 07/14/2020 7:40:15 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Wikipedia on the whole is becoming a left-wing site. It’s definitely not just about Levin. Leftists have realized since it is user created they can essentially push whatever propaganda they want. Conservatives could fight back, but we never seem to have the numbers. Wikipedia gets used all the time as if it is fact. I wish we’d start gathering the numbers to change things on the site (and yes, I have tried to do my part, but there’s only so much someone very much in the minority on Wikipedia can do).


7 posted on 07/14/2020 8:42:20 PM PDT by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

#EndTheLeft


8 posted on 07/14/2020 9:50:23 PM PDT by Gene Eric ( Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

This is nothing new but just business as usual against Levin and other conservatives. They are evil bastards.

Oddly Wikipedia is pretty good on facts if it has nothing to do with politics. They are particularly good with science. As it is not peer reviewed they do have errors in their science but it is not major and not much less than the official journals of science.

With Wikipedia if it is political one must ignore what they say. It is garbage.


9 posted on 07/14/2020 10:15:35 PM PDT by cpdiii (U-=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacrolimus1mg

Wikipedia has two uses, first as a quick reference for general, non-controversial information. Second, as a start point for identifying references for further research.

You need to know about Point Roberts, WA? Wikipedia can help.

You want to understand the arguments for and against Keynesian economics? Wikipedia is a start point at best, but must be used with caution.


10 posted on 07/15/2020 12:33:28 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
A massive exposé accusing Wikipedia of having biased editors...

I'm shocked, shocked to to hear Wikipedia has biased editors. Shocked, I tell you.

11 posted on 07/15/2020 4:46:22 AM PDT by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Wikipedia increasingly reflects the biased liberal media. Try to find much of anything really negative about the character of LBJ in the WP on him. Which is most likely because this is Wikipedia which protects its own. Thus the notorious immorality that Johnson's biographer, Robert Dallek (who is quoted as such in the article) found in his research (described in "Flawed Giant: Lyndon Johnson and his Times, 1961–1973: read online) is nowhere found
12 posted on 07/15/2020 5:22:41 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

“Snooganssnoogans”? Someone is a Jay and Silent Bob fan.


13 posted on 07/15/2020 6:01:40 AM PDT by surroundedinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson