Hey Pro, I dunno if this is worth a ping.
Is this the confrontation where a black female BLM thug felt disrespected in a fast food restaurant by a white couple, followed the couple out to their car, threatened them, refused to allow them to leave and caused damage to their car?
They were being menaced...menacing is still a crime in Michigan.
A white lady accidentally bumped into a black lady and the black lady went ballistic, stalked them to their car and blocked their car in with her body.
Black Communists Matter.
Dumbass.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Two people who defended their property has been invaded by dozens of armed protesters charged with felony assault. Despicable and shows the corruptness of the city mayor and the prosecutor.
Remember these words:
“I was afraid for my life.”
The black woman threatened to beat the S out of the man. That woman should be arrested.
I think 2A attorneys are going to take this pro bono.
Pointing a gun in someone’s face can be costly. This one cost them $10K in bond plus the husband lost his job. This is before they even get to lawyer costs. Expensive shopping trip.
The blacks involved in this were wrong, they were harassing the white couple.
BUT I’ve said this before, you do not draw a gun, you do not point a gun, unless you are about to be physically attacked, and then you draw that gun and you USE it, not to warn, you use it to disable or kill.
That’s what I understand the NRA teaches, I’ve read their articles on it.
Maybe the state law permits a gun to be drawn for hitting your car or blocking your way.
But I think drawing and pointing your weapon in this situation is poor and unsafe gun practice.
You don’t pull a gun for every altercation.
Where will this stop?
The man has already been fired for trying to get his vehicle away from a deranged bully.
I see that NBC “news” has joined other leftist rags in capitalizing black and using lower case for White.
The current insane hysterical fit the country is undergoing has led to White people being charged with a crime that a black person would not be charged for.
You only know a small part of the story,
In normal everyday situations, not a mob riot, I am choosing to not be in places where blacks are present - self segregation to reduce risk.
I back into parking spots and park well away from other vehicles but still with some protection for my car - curb, light post. Much easier to make a quick exit.
I don’t talk to people I don’t need to talk to and disengage from any interaction that I am in the least uncomfortable with. I also keep physical distance, CCPvirus is just a great excuse to maintain a large personal space.
When traveling, I avoid all cities of any size preferring smaller towns. Buy fuel, food, lodging only near small towns.
For me, the best course of action is to not be in a place where something could go wrong as much as possible, and try to always have a fast exit plan. And absolutely, maintain complete situational awareness.
After reading stories such as this, I understand why the National Guard and Sheriff's Department were so kind and gentle dealing with the terrorists yesterday.
We did not see the action that started this, bumping into someone. So that is in question and can’t be proved either way as it becomes here say and not fact.
The verbalities did not warrant the use of deadly force. And when the people in the car tried to withdraw, they were blocked by the women and she tried to push the car from the right rear of the vehicle, and after failing, struck it with her right hand.
Michigan doesn’t have a stand your ground law. They work with the self defense act,
780.972 Use of deadly force by individual not engaged in commission of crime; conditions.
Sec. 2.
(1) An individual who has not or is not engaged in the commission of a crime at the time he or she uses deadly force may use deadly force against another individual anywhere he or she has the legal right to be with no duty to retreat if either of the following applies:
(a) The individual honestly and reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the imminent death of or imminent great bodily harm to himself or herself or to another individual.
(b) The individual honestly and reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the imminent sexual assault of himself or herself or of another individual.
(2) An individual who has not or is not engaged in the commission of a crime at the time he or she uses force other than deadly force may use force other than deadly force against another individual anywhere he or she has the legal right to be with no duty to retreat if he or she honestly and reasonably believes that the use of that force is necessary to defend himself or herself or another individual from the imminent unlawful use of force by another individual.
That was not proven as it never had a chance to happen.
The Castle Act only pertains to home invasion, not a parking lot. But neither represent the need for force based upon property threat, only injury or death threat of which neither existed in this situation.
So the laws are a little different up there from some areas that identify property. But it’s the law the way the people of Michigan want it. It’s their state. I doubt a felony won’t be lowered to a misdemeanor with a fine as the circumstances are different than a normal situation by both parties.
rwood