Posted on 07/02/2020 10:36:49 AM PDT by Red Badger
Would a conservative lawyer please translate this gibberish for us?
Including photos of her at Chelseas wedding?
“...Maxwell is living in a lap of luxury in Paris right now...”
Or maybe naught.
Arrest the Judge for obstruction of justice
I suspect that this is the beginning of something very big.
Who do we know from NYC...?
Have suspected that he’s working on something rather big for a while.
The indictment of Maxwell, without a mere mention of prostitution is rather curious. There’s a rather large shoe to drop. She’s clearly turned herself in and is in the midst of cooperating with Feds.
the records arent totally destroyed
there are two cases that are intertwining
i havent read through this but sounds like records that came out before unsealing are to be destroyed by side that should not have them
it involves dershowitz case
I assume that is Paris, New Hampshire. Otherwise she must be able to travel at warp speed.
I checked earlier. She’s a George H.W. Bush appointee.
Attorneys representing Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre must destroy evidence from her case against Ghislaine Maxwell after improperly gaining access to documents, court rules
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8483209/Attorneys-representing-Virginia-Giuffre-ordered-destroy-evidence.html
gist:
‘Asked to explain how those materials came into the firm’s possession, attorneys from Cooper & Kirk explained that they had obtained access to the materials because Ms. Giuffre retained them ‘both to represent her in [Giuffre v. Dershowitz] and to represent her in conjunction with the Boies Schiller firm in the Maxwell case.’
If it’s a DC judicial branch member, I’m sure it is all very lawful
</sarcasm>
Just release them to fox, anonymously.
you guys are knee jerk reacting thinking evidence is being shredded never to be seen again
not what is happening here
One time I was on a jury regarding a technical case. At one point there was an objection from the plaintiff (client lost leg because an operation was allegedly not correct) and the jury was excused from the room. We never heard what was discussed.
But when we went into deliberation, what was discussed was there in some documents. The plaintiff, the night he lost his leg, was drunk in the ditch, with his leg folded, causing circulation to be cut off to the part that was amputated.
We found for the accused.
here are some more details about maxwells arrest
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8483581/Ghislaine-Maxwell-ARRESTED.html
How this possible?
Without seeing the order, the court is apparently saying that discovery materials in one case (collateral) cannot be used in a separate case. If this is accurate, then that happens all the time. There are protective orders entered in cases that limit use of discovery materials to just that case.
Of course the problem for those upset about the use of the collateral discovery materials is that the “cat is out of the bag” and that the information destroyed is known.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.