Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This ruling is catastrophic. This means people can come into the country in any number and the immigration laws cannot be enforced. It is a boon to demagoguing Democrats who will happily accommodate them for the votes.
1 posted on 06/15/2020 9:43:33 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Anti-Bubba182

It is. The beginning of the end of this country as we have known it.


2 posted on 06/15/2020 9:46:09 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

It appears Chief Justice Roberts was on the wrong side again. The new Earl Warren.


3 posted on 06/15/2020 9:47:08 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Maybe the 4 Democrat justices plus Roberts are counting on Biden to win so they figure that as of next year the federal government will be on board with sanctuary cities and open borders (as long as the illegal immigrants wear masks while crossing the border).


4 posted on 06/15/2020 9:48:54 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

It isn’t a ruling. SCOTUS just took the coward’s way out by declining to hear the case. Other than that detail, however, I agree with you.


6 posted on 06/15/2020 9:50:12 AM PDT by Avalon Memories (Fight the Left - the communists - not our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

*** A HUGE “IN YOUR FACE TRUMP!!!” ***


7 posted on 06/15/2020 9:50:32 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

the Supreme Court has largely nullified or seriously misused the First, Second, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments already

the Court is sort of like the pigs in Animal Farm, taking away citizens’ rights and changing the English language to do it


8 posted on 06/15/2020 9:51:10 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, theyÂ’re excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Only Laws that serve the Left are real. Deplorable laws do not count!


9 posted on 06/15/2020 9:52:17 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Caliphony


10 posted on 06/15/2020 9:52:29 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

No. Trump needs to force their hand and start enforcing the laws on the books


12 posted on 06/15/2020 9:54:34 AM PDT by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Considering the Supreme Court refused the case and the 9th circuit says the Law is OK by them, NOTHING PREVENTS the Administration from CRIMINALLY CHARGING the Elected Officials for Human Smuggling. FORCE them to Defend themselves in Criminal Court, all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.


13 posted on 06/15/2020 9:55:02 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

If Biden wins there will be no need for sanctuary cities because we will be a sanctuary country


15 posted on 06/15/2020 9:58:16 AM PDT by nbenyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Weird. Under Obama the courts said all power in the federal government, and under Trump the states and local governments retain control. No double standard here at all.


16 posted on 06/15/2020 9:58:32 AM PDT by ilgipper (The mob only destroys. Never creates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

No one’s begun to pay for their crimes against America, so our domestic enemies keep doubling down.

Did USSC ever decline to hear anything the left’s god the Fraud wanted done?


17 posted on 06/15/2020 10:01:55 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

They just declined to hear would like to know who the justices were who declined to hear this is NOT the full court declining to hear!!


21 posted on 06/15/2020 10:05:07 AM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182
The justices did not offer comment on their decision, though two — Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. — said they wanted to hear the case. It takes four justices to put a case on the court’s calendar.

So, at most three justices thought that they should hear the case. Thomas, Alito, and possibly one more. This means that at least one of Trump's appointees voted against hearing this case.

Why do we even have a Supreme Court? They will not hear crucial cases which determine the future of our country and hinge upon the interpretation of the Constitution. They refuse to do their job. Might as well defund the Supreme Court.

22 posted on 06/15/2020 10:06:43 AM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

This is about getting rid of White people. In the end, if you’re still alive just look around and see whose riding high on the hog and not having to wear a mask.

Look who the lawyers are who always defend these invaders and how they are able to paralyze our system.


25 posted on 06/15/2020 10:10:42 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

This ruling is catastrophic. This means people can come into the country in any number and the immigration laws cannot be enforced.

*************

If they’re not going to enforce laws we can play this game too.


28 posted on 06/15/2020 10:13:14 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

“This ruling is catastrophic. This means people can come into the country in any number and the immigration laws cannot be enforced. It is a boon to demagoguing Democrats who will happily accommodate them for the votes.”

Nothing in the ruling prevents the Feds from continuing to enforce immigration laws. What it does though is inhibits cooperation from local law enforcement.


29 posted on 06/15/2020 10:15:01 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Can we say compromised Justice?

😡

31 posted on 06/15/2020 10:17:15 AM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you haave. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Didn’t they already rule on Arizona’s SB1070 that “only fedguv can enforce immigration law”?
And doesn’t “sanctuary cities” violate that ruling?


37 posted on 06/15/2020 10:23:53 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson