Posted on 06/13/2020 5:29:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
It is no secret that tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs when the government shut down their businesses – restaurants, bars, etc. Of course, some of those job losses would have occurred even without government interference – people do not want to rub elbows during the pandemic. However, it is fair to say that massive government intervention did contribute to additional losses of income to millions.
It is also no secret that showering the voters with money in an election year is a tactic employed by politicians all around the world. Some of the emergency $600 weekly payments in unemployment benefits make sense in the context of a lockdown, perhaps as a tacit way for the government to say “sorry we closed your bar.” However, the recently proposed extension of these $600 payments until January 31, 2021 would bring very bad unintended consequences.
Economists and even politicians have criticized this proposal. Some correctly point out that with an additional $600 per week of emergency unemployment benefits, for nearly half of the population, not working would bring home more money than actually working, would therefore be a reasonable financial decision. The implications of this would be huge. You think elections right now resemble the auction of promising more free stuff? Fast forward to 2021, when people would have spent nearly a year not working and receiving more money.
Perhaps the COVID pandemic was a new development that we have not seen in modern times. However, people choosing not to work because not working pays more than working is a widely known and studied phenomenon. It is called the “unemployment trap” and anyone doing economics for a living knows about it.
The double-digit unemployment rates incurred during the lockdowns in the U.S. persist in some European countries, COVID or no COVID. For example, Spain’s unemployment rate was 17% in 2009, 26% in 2013, and 14% in 2019. Italy’s unemployment rate has been hovering around 10% for almost a decade now. For the past 20 years, the American unemployment rate was roughly half of the EU’s.
Also note, that official unemployment numbers in Europe usually appear lower than actual unemployment because of some quirks in measurement, or various re-training and education schemes which classified those who do not work as “in education” and therefore not unemployed, when in fact they are unemployed.
The unemployment trap is much more significant and persistent in Europe than in the U.S.
All this supports the common sense logic that, if it pays to not to seek employment, some people will consciously choose unemployment. Of course, there are many factors at play and the unemployment trap is not the only factor here. However, it is fascinating to observe the laws of economics working in countries as different as Spain, Italy, and the U.S.
Short term unemployment, even if caused by extraordinary events can lead to long-term unemployment, loss of skills, and even less opportunity to return to work (or at least well-paid work). It is quicksand, wet cement, bog – pick any metaphor – easy to get in, but hard to get out. Loss of skills, loss of qualifications, not keeping up with the latest trends in your field of expertise – these are objective reasons why short-term unemployment can become chronic.
There also are subjective reasons for people choosing not to work. It is more complicated than mere “laziness,” “lack of character,” etc. At the same time, creating situations where it is financially more advantageous not to work does reward these features.
Moreover, it also discourages those who are industrious and do want to earn their living themselves. Going to work every day, not seeing your kids, and collecting exactly the same paycheck as your neighbor next door who spends his days on his couch is devastating to morale and fans dissent or outright hatred.
An economic policy of many right and even left-oriented governments has been to avoid long-term unemployment. While it is difficult and not all governments have been successful, encouraging unemployment is a devastating policy with devastating results. Helping people to get back to work as soon as possible is superior to encouraging them to stay at home.
The stimulus is a debit card. Everyone called it a check. I wa going to pay bills with it. One cannot easily deposit it into the bank. I gave up I’ll use it for groceries imagine what people do with it who have no clue about budgeting
My neighbor is getting this extra $600...and she had been working part time. She’s not in a hurry to go back to work. This little bonus amounts to $10,000.
“if it pays to not to seek employment, some people will consciously choose unemployment”
Well, duh.
My sister was unemployed due to covid and is now drawing over twice as much in unemployment than she was making while she worked.
Indeed
My husband’s and my stimulus checks were deposited to our joint bank account. I had filed our return early as our property taxes were due the end of February and we needed the money.
It should inform you as to the character of someone who would take more money in unemployment than what they were making employed.
There’s some FReepers who were giddy at their windfall from the US. As I said, it should inform people (it did me) as to the character as to someone who would accept more than what they were making.
The $600 are for children they have. Our kids are grown and have kids themselves
The unemployment portion of the stimulus...You get whatever your state provides PLUS $600 additional dollars per week until the end of July.
I think what we are seeing with all of these government payments is the roundabout beginning for universal basic income in the US. We will see what comes in July, but I think we are already addicted to it.
I wonder how they decided that some people should get a check and others a debit card. I got a check.
It’s not a trap - this is intentional.
This is how you institute socialism. You start emergency payments and then you never take them away because that would harm the people.
"Remember on November 3rd, the Republicans are offering $1,827.00/month - while we Democrats guarantee you $3,267.00 - plus a $5,000.00 annual bonus. Democrats. We Care About Change."
Some of us permanently replaced by filthy H1B Indian scum don’t have a choice but to depend on the $600 per week enhanced unemployment. Thousands of resumes sent out in fields related to my 30 years work and not a single real interview.
Being told by recruiters that I don’t qualify even as a corporate trainer (no TOEFL score) is nonsense. I was a TOEFL examiner at one time
My wife works as an educator in a joint public-private partnership program. She was “temporarily” laid off due to the virus scare and, due to the extra $600 per week, is making considerably more money. She was initially supposed to return to work for their Summer program, but was recently informed that it is not “safe” and that she may not be returning until next year.
Hmm.
Ok well I received a debit card. No way to deposit into my bank account It’s fine I just wonder about people who are irresponsible with their finances or lack thereof.
Withdraw the cash at atm
Deposit into checking
Write check to Trump election campaign
Mail check with a thank you card
Enjoy gloat-beer
You can actually walk in to the bank that issued the debit card and withdraw every penny from it. Then walk into your bank and deposit the cash.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.