Well, that's excellent news. Let's have federal terrorism charges for these two. Maybe they can enjoy a wicked pepper steak.
Posted on 06/05/2020 10:35:13 PM PDT by knighthawk
The New York City lawyers accused of hurling a Molotov cocktail into a NYPD van are back in custody after a decision to release them on bail was reversed in court.
On Friday, the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York announced that lawyers Urooj Rahman, 31, and Clinford Mattis, 32, were back in federal custody after the U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the bail decision by the District Court.
Meanwhile, a video has emerged that reveals Rahman blaming Mayor Bill de Blasio for not restraining officers for their own safety less than one hour before the alleged incident.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Her actual violent crime allowed her to get out on bail, but a video of her bad mouthing de Blah Blah was the clincher to have it revoked. Okaaaayyyyy.
Doesn’t that make the lawyers political prisoners?
Thug chic
She looks very happy. Hope they give her 20 years for terrorism.
Well, I can hope, right?
She looks very happy. Hope they give her 20 years for terrorism.
Well, I can hope, right?
_______________________________
Maybe or maybe not...
There could be a plea bargain for both of them...
Plea guilty to a felony for a lenient sentence...
The guy is suspended from his law firm...
She is unemployed at this time...
I once watched a documentary about porn actors on Pluto TV...
A porn actress left the business and became a real estate agent...
One day her employer fired her...Somebody contacted the employer and stated that she used to be a porn actress...
She used her real name for employment...But, the employer still found out...My point is that it is not easy to hide one’s past...
These two people will eventually have to work somewhere...
The female lawyer might apply for some job without telling the employer that she was once arrested for throwing a Molotov cocktail...She might get hired for that job...Then, one day the employer might find out the truth...Then she will be fired for being dishonest...
Could both of them work for Senator Schumer?
No...I don’t see that happening...I think even Schumer would be uncomfortable hiring people who tried to destroy police cars...
Weird... we know who bailed out Ulooj but that story made no mention of who bailed out Clinford Mattis. So, who bailed him out ?
It’s difficult to practice law, after you lose your law licence.
Since (speaking charitably) one possible reason for guaranteed bail would be ethnic / national solidarity with another "person of colour" busy "fighting the system" and resisting "OrangeManBad."
Or if they secretly approve of that person's actions, and that's why they guaranteed bail?
You want to bet?
The former Dem Speaker of the House, Jim Wright, had a top staffer who apparently tried to hammer and stab a woman to death.
Source:
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-1989-05-05-8901230738-story.html
LOL!
From what little I’ve read or heard, getting free of that industry is tough.
There was once a teacher or school staffer years ago that was fired when it was found she was in the business years before going to a legit job.
There is always politics.
If they were working for Antifa that makes them international terrorists. What is the charge for joining a foreign mercenary unit against America?
Bump
She’ll get a job w/ NY Times, CNN or MSNBC. This arrest and any pending convictions will be resume enhancers.
You want to bet?
The former Dem Speaker of the House, Jim Wright, had a top staffer who apparently tried to hammer and stab a woman to death.
Source:
____________________________________
Thanks for the information...
Liberals don’t like to punish criminals...They should not be trusted with public safety at all...
If I was on the jury, I’d happily give them 25-30 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.