Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down Tony Evers' stay-at-home order that closed businesses, schools to limit spread of coronavirus
Milwaukee Journal Sentinal ^ | 05/13/20 | Molly Beck

Posted on 05/13/2020 3:44:23 PM PDT by T. P. Pole

MADISON - The Wisconsin Supreme Court has struck down Gov. Tony Evers' order shutting down daily life to limit the spread of coronavirus — marking the first time a statewide order of its kind has been knocked down by a court of last resort.

The state's highest court, which is controlled by conservatives, sided with Republican lawmakers Wednesday in a decision that curbed the Evers administration's power to act unilaterally during public health emergencies.

(Excerpt) Read more at jsonline.com ...


TOPICS: US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; civilliberties; classactionfodder; coronavirus; reopen; roguelist; shutdown; tonyevers; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: T. P. Pole
The feds are quick to jump when it involves White on Black Civil Rights Violations so ... Why don't they involve themselves when it involves ... Everyone's Civil Rights?

I don't understand why the feds don't put an end to the trampling of the peoples constitutional rights!?

Regardless of what or how individual state constitutions are written .. States are subject to the U.S. Constitution, same as the feds!

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.

This greatly expanded the civil and legal rights of all American citizens by protecting them from infringement by the states as well as by the federal government.

The third clause, "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law," expanded the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to apply to the states as well as the federal government.

Over time, the Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to guarantee a wide array of rights against infringement by the states, including those enumerated in the Bill of Rights (freedom of speech, free exercise of religion, right to bear arms, etc.) as well as the right to privacy and other fundamental rights not mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution.

In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution.

"All laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."
Marbury v. Madison


Everything that these dictators are doing is unconstitutional .. regardless of any State or added on Amendment laws!

As a citizen, not owned or working for the state and who's God Given Rights were affirmed by the Highest court in the land, I have the Right ... the duty, not to obey any unlawful order, just because some 'appointed' entity has deemed it a law!
21 posted on 05/13/2020 4:02:43 PM PDT by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
And the Money Quotes are:

"In the majority opinion, Roggesack determined Department of Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm should have issued such state restrictions through a process known as rule making, which gives lawmakers veto power over agency policies."

Without legislative review, 'an unelected official could create law applicable to all people during the course of COVID-19 and subject people to imprisonment when they disobeyed her order,' the majority wrote."

On, Wisconsin! So much WINNING this week!

22 posted on 05/13/2020 4:04:00 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole
The state's highest court, which is controlled by conservatives...

Good for WI. Now what is the state of the highest courts in MI, PA, ME, etc?

23 posted on 05/13/2020 4:04:46 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Like Whitmer pulled that 77 yesr barber’s licence after Whitmer lost in court?
Well he just went on cutting hair. Who needs a licence to cut hair anyways?


24 posted on 05/13/2020 4:05:13 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

Emergency powers are not open ended. All of the governors could and should have consulted with their legislatures to proceed with whatever measures they would enforce and what the enforcement would be.


25 posted on 05/13/2020 4:06:31 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

The Executive cannot create law, particularly a “law” which has a criminal/penal sanction. Only the legislature can do that. And the legislature cannot delegate that power to the executive.


26 posted on 05/13/2020 4:07:07 PM PDT by henkster ("We can always fool the foreigner" - Chinese Proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

What a glorious day.
First the congressional wins in Wisconsin and California, then this great victory in court over illegal, unconstitutional lockdowns.


27 posted on 05/13/2020 4:09:10 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

And every single state is different, depending on the political make-up of the Governor, Legislature and State courts.

Red states open. Blue states close. Some arrest people or revoke their business licenses. Some don’t. Some declare the closure rules unconstitutional. Some don’t. 50 states - 50 different sets of rules - mostly determined solely by what political party is in power in that state.

What a total kluster-fuck.

Lifelong conservative here, but a problem like COVID-19 can only be solved by a NATIONAL, COORDINATED response.

And in that, sad to say, Trump has TOTALLY failed. (Hey, great strategy - push the decisions to the states and blame or praise them as needed. Wow. Genius! </sarc>) I’m really struggling to vote for him again in Nov - and probably the ONLY reason I will is that the alternative is just so God awful horrible. But I sure would like for this guy to get his shi~! together. Unfortunately, not really confident he will based on what we’ve seen so far.


28 posted on 05/13/2020 4:10:03 PM PDT by jstolzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstolzen

Lifelong conservative here, but a problem like COVID-19 can only be solved by a NATIONAL, COORDINATED response.


So if the NATIONAL, COORDINATED response is to impose a police state, every single state suffers that?


29 posted on 05/13/2020 4:12:10 PM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Instead they will threaten to pull business licenses, which is what Tom Wolf is doing in PA.

Destroying one's entire livelihood seems to be nothing more than an especially draconian fine...

(Deuteronomy 24:6) The millstone was needed to grind grain to make bread and sustain life, so taking someone’s millstone would be like taking his or her life

30 posted on 05/13/2020 4:12:35 PM PDT by null and void (By the pricking of my lungs, Something wicked this way comes ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
"Interesting. I’d be willing to bet that one of these closures will eventually reach SCOTUS...and given the gravity of this stuff I’d wager that they’ll accept the case."

Maybe but given previous SCOTUS precedents, they aren't going to rule against properly enacted emergency powers.

A lot of cases will end up at Circuit Courts. But I suspect most will be resolved there.

It's going to take something like differences at various Circuit courts with the treatment equality with definitions of Essential vs non-essential businesses, or something regarding least restrictive measures to accomplish the goals.

31 posted on 05/13/2020 4:14:53 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
I grew up about 80 mi west of there. We always heard it as... Madison, 77 square miles surrounded by reality.
32 posted on 05/13/2020 4:16:27 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jstolzen

Dr Fauci is that you?


33 posted on 05/13/2020 4:18:22 PM PDT by hercuroc (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Do the bureaucrats have the right to make laws by edict?

Actually they do.

Blame our lazy politician. What they do is write a vague law and then authorize some bureaucrat to define the details of that law.

Not laws but regulations that can be enforced with fines.


34 posted on 05/13/2020 4:22:03 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

Well, this might just set a precedent by knocking down a governor’s orders as unconstitutional. This might go to the Supreme Court. Who knows?


35 posted on 05/13/2020 4:23:20 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

The bars are open tonight in Wisconsin


36 posted on 05/13/2020 4:24:32 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jstolzen

I would like it to go to the Supreme Court. I would love it if the Supreme Court declares the need to make all state governors’ actions Unconstitutional as well.


37 posted on 05/13/2020 4:25:07 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: virgil

How do you drink with a mask on? Do you cut a small hole and put a straw through it?


38 posted on 05/13/2020 4:25:40 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

I’ve been screaming this! Governors, Presidents, and Mayors CANNOT make laws. A function of legislative bodies!


39 posted on 05/13/2020 4:26:08 PM PDT by TStro (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I’d be willing to bet that one of these closures will eventually reach SCOTUS..“

Already happened sort of. The SC let stand the ruling by a state SC that the rat Governor had the right to put everyone under house arrest.


40 posted on 05/13/2020 4:28:00 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson