Posted on 05/12/2020 12:08:05 PM PDT by janetjanet998
On Tuesday ABC reporter Alex Mallin tweeted out that a senior DOJ official says we do not intend to release the unmasking list.
(Statistically impossible, but nonetheless...)
I can see how the release would only benefit the left.
What is a legality? Shifty McPencilneck would simply leak the entire file to a friendly “reporter” who would reliably reprint it in its entirety while keeping Shifty’s identity a closely held secret.
Right, just like your experience told you we would never see the transcripts with all the smoking gun evidence last week. You people with all the doom and gloom are really a bore to listen too. You really think Barr is going to release all that evidence so the American people can see how guilty they coup plotters are and then he’s not going to prosecute? You people are absolute morons to believe such a thing. And who cares if they release the list of names right now, we will see it sooner or later, besides we know who they are, unless you’ve not been paying attention. All I’ll say is those who follow Q know whom the unmaskers are and we have for some time.
Eventually, we will have to storm DC before they understand we have a RIGHT to that information. We have a RIGHT to know who was engaged in political spying.
There is no ‘law’ you filthy peasants. Only power
What’s really amazing is how many stupid people believe anything reported by ABC concerning this issue. Lenin had a name for all of you people who believe this, it’s “useful idiots”.
Ah yes, there is always that possibility. Similar to the possibility of free beer tomorrow.
Of course he can. Classification isnt a supposed to be used to hide criminal activity.
From Fox
Justice Department reviewing unmasking, but source suggests decision on releasing files is DNI’s ‘call’
We already know who did it. Have you not been paying attention? I think you just want to complain, about anything so you can feel like a victim, just like a leftist. You people on this thread are really weak or you’re plants sent from the dems to try to sow hate and discontent on conservative forums. It doesn’t work because the smart people who pay attention on this site can spot you a mile away.
C’mon folks! Are you that dense? This is evidence. It’s a road map for potential witnesses if you publicly disclose it now. Grinnell obviously gave it to Barr to use on the cases being developed.
“All Ill say is those who follow Q know whom the unmaskers are and we have for some time.”
Oh, it’s protected for future prosecution but special Q people have the list.
Which means it isn’t protected at all.
Give us the list. The Q threads aren’t secure. The list is in the public record if it’s in a Q thread.
However, tensions appear to be emerging between the ODNI and DOJ over who should make the call on whether to actually release the documents shared by Grenell.
The DOJ official told Fox News that the Justice Department currently has no plans to release that list of names.
“The Justice Department is confused as to where the idea that we would be releasing this information came from, given that ODNI is the owner of that information, if they want to release it they can do it, that’s their call,” the DOJ official told Fox News.
“Cmon folks! Are you that dense? This is evidence. Its a road map for potential witnesses if you publicly disclose it now. Grinnell obviously gave it to Barr to use on the cases being developed.”
There was never any reason to declassify it then.
If the list of unmaskers is to be incorporated into Federal Indictment on the FISA court fraud (a major Federal crime) then this would make sense.
The ones who did the unmasking know who they are-— and their responses (or non-response) are of note... so keep watching.
If the “senior DOJ official” is not named then the “source” has to be completely suspect. In prosecution terms public release of “security clearance” level information that would be in the indictment documents.... should not be released to the public... until the indictment is served. Otherwise— it could all be thrown out of what already bull crap fed court would receive it-— rather easily by the “competition” sitting on the federal benches.
Rogue agents in Indy... or Mobile... or...
Too funny. Declass for me but not for thee. It’s declassified but can’t be revealed because, it’s evidence!
Which means its classified.
Well, you see, it has to be kept secret. Except for Q people, who have a Q clearance apparently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.