Posted on 05/12/2020 12:08:05 PM PDT by janetjanet998
ROFLOL!!!!
Barr can— Trump gave him the authority. The question is— Barr can give this over to the various prosecutors as evidence-— iron clad evidence. Then let the arrests begin.
Very dramatic.
Another possibility— when looking for a “tag, you’re it” one of the unmaskers to “flip” and spill the beans on obamaumao— it would be wise not to release en masse the names.
Run it by all of them, get them to squirm (apparently they are ALL lawyering up, to have someone negotiate this)... Rosenstein, Lynch, Comey, Clapper, Rice,and especially the Irish native Samantha Powers (UN Ambassador who was the queen of unmaskers at 1/day).
All the people Gowdy asked Comey (who was sitting next to Adm. Rogers- National Hero when he replied).
This is misleading and appears to be ABC’s attempt to muddy the waters for entertainment purposes.
The names were given to DOJ as a courtesy for any investigations the names may be applicable to. The ODNI has full and sole authority to release these names as he wishes. I assume that will be after DOJ has advised his office of their intent.
Perhaps there’s ongoing investigations...Barr and Durham and company have kept much close to the vest to keep from compromising what they have been doing...if it weren’t for them, none of the recent revelations would have come out...even though much was “common knowledge”, they have compiled evidence to back that knowledge up.
sundance says this has more to do with privacy issues of WHO was UNMASKED, not whodunnit.
Since it is ABC, it is only fractionally believable-if at all-and it is probably evidence-if that is the case, no names are going to be released until witnesses have been rounded up, “encouraged” to drop the dime on superiors and hearings have begun-it isn’t prudent to throw out info prematurely just to give bread and circuses to the public in a legal matter...
“Morons?”
Heavy duty Q inside talk, you wouldn’t understand.
I’m a long-time Q follower, btw. I have no problem with Q, but a lot of problems with *some* Q followers.
Yep.
C’mon...a “source” tells ABC “News”, and we’re going with that? Really?
Oh let’s see, an ABC repprter claims an unnamed soucre in the DOJ says they won’t release the list...
Gee sounds like BS to me....
“senior DOJ official”
See Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary of Swamp English: slovenly, leach-like creature attached to United States taxpayers for which there has, heretofore, not been a curative solution...soon to be removed by a newly discovered process called “Trumping.”
The DOJ official told Fox News that the Justice Department currently has no plans to release that list of names.
“The Justice Department is confused as to where the idea that we would be releasing this information came from, given that ODNI is the owner of that information, if they want to release it they can do it, that’s their call,” the DOJ official told Fox News.
By "we" he or she means, himself or herself and the rest of the Demagogic Party criminal residue in the DOJ.
Saiid it along, the elitist protect their own.
Comey’s buddy might be available.
I would have no problem at all with waiting to release the names until indictments are issued with all of the names on them.
I am not holding my breath though.
I think you make the most sense. Thanks.
So can’t Grenell do it himself?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.