Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What? Senior DOJ Official Says Justice Dept. Does Not Intend to Release the Unmasking List Delivered to DOJ by DNI Ric Grenell
gp ^

Posted on 05/12/2020 12:08:05 PM PDT by janetjanet998

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last
To: janetjanet998

They won’treease it because each peroson illegally uinmasked would have all the evidence they need to personally sue the perpetrators for damages.

Thats 1000 law suits against those who exceeded their governmental authority and ersonally commited these tortios abuse of power violations.

The perpetrators would loose their estates and be fiancially ruined. Therefore the list of unmasked victims will not be released?

We need to have a massive protest group on the steps of the DOJ complete with pitchforks, tar and feathers!


101 posted on 05/13/2020 3:17:35 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Didn't see anything in my post that would indicate I needed to calm down...perhaps you're more emotional about it than I am.

I agree that the DOJ seems to have a good handle on what they are doping - it's why I offered a possible reason for withholding the list - some of the folks on it may be under investigation for some of them "Ironclad felonies" you mention.

I also would like for Sullivan to finalize the deal...It took the DOJ a while to get to their conclusion and he's been controversial for quite a while, so it will be interesting to see if he finally concurs or decides to kiss the Schiff/Obama/Comey/Mueller/Stzrok/Paige rings...no sense being fired up...yet.

102 posted on 05/13/2020 3:44:34 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Sorry I did not intend that for you. It was meant for some who were pushing the panic button. But as time marches on it looks like they may be right as that judge is definitely looking to deep six the dismissal. I never heard of seeking opinions on rendering a verdict. Just another DCPOS in my view. He had ample reason to toss this case long ago without a AG motion to dismiss.


103 posted on 05/13/2020 4:05:19 AM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

No problem...I also agree he had ample reason to toss it and for a while it seemed like it might happen...he will have to stretch to not allow it to die a graceful death now...here’s hoping.


104 posted on 05/13/2020 11:06:50 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson