Dirty Dozen: The 12 revelations that sunk Mueller's case against Flynn

justthenews.com ^ | By John Solomon

[janetjanet998]

Shortly after my colleague Sara Carter and I began reporting in 2017 on the possibility that the FBI was abusing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on Americans during the Russia investigation, I received a call. It was an intermediary for someone high up in the intelligence community.

[Lurkinanloomin]

The Federal Bureau of Incrimination And Sedition (FBIAS) needs to be disbanded.

They have proven they are untrustworthy.

[janetjanet998]

I didn’t know until now Solomon got a Tip back in 2017 about closing the case against Flynn

I wonder if that is who tipped Jensen/Durham off

[AndyJackson]

Then FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who neither attended the interview nor is an agent, edited it again, according to the DOJ evidence. And then that version of the 302 was never given to the court. Instead, a substitute summary of the interview written months later was presented as official evidence, an act current and former FBI officials told me was extraordinarily unusual.

In other words the 302s are not evidence presented by a fact witness. They are hearsay.

[_longranger81]

Not hearsay. Wholesale invention.
Fiction.
Lies.
Damnable lies.

[janetjanet998]

In other words the 302s are not evidence presented by a fact witness. They are hearsay.

---

The next thing you know the Democrats will claim hearsay is better then a direct witness and............oh wait

[frank ballenger]

I never watch leftist news media but have heard “there is no mention on most shows and barely a mention on others of the Flynn case.”

A talk radio collage of soundbites from the guilty plea day had horrible slurs against us as impressionable Deplorables who now could finally see the light that Trump was guilty. “Millions of their heads are exploding tonight” a female gleefully opined.

Now they are mute. No one hears a word of the corruption of our system of justice to be used deliberately against Flynn and Trump.

So the American people will be shocked to hear that Mueller and Comey types are on he hotseat from Barr and Durham——God willing!.

[Menehune56]

In the meantime, Flynn lost three years of his life, his job, and his home and endured crushing legal bills and public shame. That what makes this dirty dozen list so egregious to critics of this investigation.

Thanks for posting this. I sincerely hope General Flynn can be made whole for the financial losses he suffered during this witch hunt.

[NFHale]

RE “sunk the case”:

So.... when does the retribution begin?

When does General Flynn get back what he is owed, what was stolen from him?

When do we get to see Comey, Clapper, and all the crooked agents etc., get perp-walked and frog-marched?

Those are the only questions that matter right now.

[ReleaseTheHounds]

Or rather just lop-off the 7th floor and round-up all the 2016-19 criminals and send them to Gitmo.

[McGavin999]

It is so refreshing to read something from a real investigative reporter instead of the pap put out by the mean girls of the NYT and WP.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Nice summary - bookmarked.

[Rocky]

Remember Ray Donovan?

On May 25, 1987, Donovan (and all of the other defendants) were acquitted, after which Donovan was famously quoted as asking, "Which office do I go to to get my reputation back?"

[littleharbour]

Sullivan is a corrupt judge. He should have tossed out the case for FBI and DOJ obstruction, for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence. That he didn’t, and that he is now dragging his heels on the DOJ motion to withdraw, proves corruption at all levels: politicians, FBI, prosecutors, original defence lawyers, DOJ, FISA, and the trial judge.🤬

[USS Alaska]

In other words the 302s are not evidence presented by a fact witness. They are hearsay.

Can anyone imagine, that in 2020 when 7 year old kids can use the audio/video record function on their own, personal phone, send it to the cloud for storage, and later review it, that the fbi is still recording interviews via a hand written, memory recollection?

How in the world can this practice be justified?

It has always been open for fraud, but before this, we had some sense of trust for the 99.9% of the hard working, pure as the driven snow, fbi agents, as always pointed out by hannity.

BTW, did you know that hannity came from a cop laden family, and his two uncles were deity, because they were fbi?

The fbi is corrupt. People talk about the "seventh floor".

Who the hell were working on the first six floors, ninja mutants?

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

I sincerely hope General Flynn can be made whole for the financial losses he suffered during this witch hunt.

I sincerely hope that General Flynn sues the wire services and their members/subscribers, joint and several liability for libel.

And that the courts (read, SCOTUS) force them all to mount a pro-Flynn PR campaign sufficient to restore his reputation such that Gen. Flynn ends up polling at least 75% positive. As well as being very rich.

[Steve_Seattle]

There’s no apparent mention of the Flynn case in today’s online version of my local paper, The Seattle Times. True, the story broke yesterday, but in a story of this magnitude you’d expect some secondary stories, follow-up, analysis, or commentary. I saw none.

[NTHockey]

What do you think a defense lawyer is going to do anytime a 302 is submitted as evidence. “Your Honor, I move to exclude all testimony in the 302 or related to in the 302. It is hearsay.”

Mafia, Cartel, individuals in prison will be first in line.

[j.havenfarm]

California Evidence Code is a little bit different than the Federal Rules of Evidence, but this much should be the same: the 302 is admissible,
Not to prove the truth of the matter asserted, Flynn’s innocence, but that the statement asserting innocence was made. That’s all the legal significance that is needed in this case

[j.havenfarm]

California Evidence Code is a little bit different than the Federal Rules of Evidence, but this much should be the same: the 302 is admissible,
Not to prove the truth of the matter asserted, Flynn’s innocence, but that the statement asserting innocence was made. That’s all the legal significance that is needed in this case