In other words the 302s are not evidence presented by a fact witness. They are hearsay.
Not hearsay. Wholesale invention.
Fiction.
Lies.
Damnable lies.
In other words the 302s are not evidence presented by a fact witness. They are hearsay.
The next thing you know the Democrats will claim hearsay is better then a direct witness and............oh wait
Can anyone imagine, that in 2020 when 7 year old kids can use the audio/video record function on their own, personal phone, send it to the cloud for storage, and later review it, that the fbi is still recording interviews via a hand written, memory recollection?
How in the world can this practice be justified?
It has always been open for fraud, but before this, we had some sense of trust for the 99.9% of the hard working, pure as the driven snow, fbi agents, as always pointed out by hannity.
BTW, did you know that hannity came from a cop laden family, and his two uncles were deity, because they were fbi?
The fbi is corrupt. People talk about the "seventh floor".
Who the hell were working on the first six floors, ninja mutants?
No. A real “302” is a written summary of what an FBI agent(s) said, asked and got in reply from those they have questioned on various issues.
I’ve read enough of them (good ones on a national security case), to know that the agents did a good job of writing up what was asked, said, and discussed as in replies.
This Deep State manipulation of some “302s” is not the norm (and I hope that it never is). I also read a lot of depositions where the stenographer takes down everything that is said (and usually tapes its too) for an accurate and complete transcription of what was said, asked and replied. These depositions are more detailed than a “302” but if you’ve ever read a law enforcement transcript of a wiretap, you know that they are complete (even if there are redactions in the lesser or declassified versions).
Ah the FBI, gotta love me. If they do not have any evidence, they will make its up