Replies

No. A real “302” is a written summary of what an FBI agent(s) said, asked and got in reply from those they have questioned on various issues.

I’ve read enough of them (good ones on a national security case), to know that the agents did a good job of writing up what was asked, said, and discussed as in replies.

This Deep State manipulation of some “302s” is not the norm (and I hope that it never is). I also read a lot of depositions where the stenographer takes down everything that is said (and usually tapes its too) for an accurate and complete transcription of what was said, asked and replied. These depositions are more detailed than a “302” but if you’ve ever read a law enforcement transcript of a wiretap, you know that they are complete (even if there are redactions in the lesser or declassified versions).

I’ve read enough of them (good ones on a national security case), to know that the agents did a good job of writing up what was asked, said, and discussed as in replies.

But did they?

After all, there's no recording, no accurate transcript for you to compare the 302 to. There is no actual evidence for any of that, aside from the agent who wrote it saying that that's what he thinks he remembers. Just because he did a good job writing up the supposed conversation, is tangential to whether or not his well-written story is accurate as to what was actually said.

Tom Clancy wrote plenty of real good stories, but not all of them have come true yet.

Lisa Page, who was apparently not present for the interview, edited the 302 in question. Look up Mary Beth Kepner backdated 302s and her lying about it under oath. It might not be common but it does happen.