Skip to comments.FULL INTERVIEW: The Megyn Kelly Interview of Tara Reade (42 Minutes)
Posted on 05/09/2020 3:31:15 AM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD
I had not seen the FULL interview posted anywhere (only bits & pieces), so here it is, from YouTube.
The interview has a lot of new details of harassment in Biden's office and discusses other people who knew (uses first names only). I find Ms. Reade totally believable. She makes eye contact and addresses every question. Looks like the reason we did not hear more from her earlier is because she had a child, had a bad marriage with domestic violence she ended with a restraining order and a change of identity, then went to law school and became a lawyer for domestic violence victims. She says she did not want to be in the press about all this while her child was young, which sounds right to me. And then when she came forward later she was ignored.
WMAL PING LIST! Good Morning!
P.S. - Hurry up & watch it before YouTube takes it down!
Fox and Friends reported a little while ago that the victim is leaving the rat party
Very convincing. Lots of details and emotion. Biden raped her.
Seems to me that there can be no doubt that Plugs is perfectly *capable* of doing what this woman accuses him of having done.My money’s on “guilty as charged”.
She said he stuck his fingers up her...
I had to pic up a daughter after an assault at her job. A pretty unpleasant memory. This brought is back. She burst into tears after getting in the car.
I know she recently reported this to the DC police. The assault is past the statute of limitations there. Since this happened on federal property, I wonder if any statutes are still applicable.
I have not tuned into FOX since that debate idiocy they permitted.
Why are the Dems and supporters not tearing Tara Reade apart like they usually do to anyone who says something against a dem?
She says she did not want to be in the press about all this while her child was young, which sounds right to me.
Don’t buy her excuse for not going to the police. She was hardly in the position a a male at Yale who was falsely accused of rape. The women’s movement was as strong then as it is now. A whole army of activists would have leapt to her defense, and nobody would have dared to touch her. By not going to the police, she let Biden and others get away with this and encouraged people to suspect that the real reason was that she led him on.
This is me!
Id love to watch but I swore Id never give that hose bag Megan K another second of my time!
The scumbag Dems wanted Biden so bad, have at him now! Soak him up real good. Not only a predator, but a creepy child touching freak !
This woman should sue the ever lovin shit outta ol Joe-the pervert
And Megyn Kelly does a good job of digging down so as to give Ms. Reade an opportunity to address all questions that might have arisen from her previously confusing comments.
This happened on the Capitol grounds, where the Capitol police rule.
Biden was already a pretty powerful politician. Those were the days of Ted Kennedy & other misbehavior, also.
The cover-up of such behavior has already been shown thru the PAYMENTS that the taxpayers paid for.
We NEVER have learned all those names & payments, either.
Boys Will Be Boys ruled the day....even in 1993.
Kelly’s strong suit has always been legal issues.
She should have stuck with that.
She was excellent in the Freddie Grey case. Called Marilyn Mosby on all her incompetent BS.
Still waiting for the #MeToo movement to take action.
Dont buy her excuse for not going to the police.
I buy it. I have some problem with her for other reasons, which I will outline below.
The police though were the Capital Police. DC, especially official DC, is much worse than a university and you mostly get a response based on where you are in the hierarchy by and large, or who wants to get dirt on who, not on justice etc. What she should have done was get a lawyer, so that if she documented this through the CP, then she could have gone on the the DC police or whatever. And then go up the government ladder. You can see by the history of the House Ethics committee that they usually buy off complainers and I am thinking it is likely not very different for the Senate but maybe they use another tactic. She really had little guidance and was not very aware. This is not uncommon in DC for ambitious but uninformed people, example, Monica Lewinsky.
What makes me more suspicious of her at this point is that this is the second long interview I have seen/heard, the first with another reporter, and she tears up and chokes up at the same time. And then she is perfectly lucid in her following statements. This smacks of rehearsal. I’m not saying that what she says is not true, but her character appears to continue unformed and kind of unrealistic way after her young adulthood. There is a fine line between being uneducated or uninformed and repeatedly walking into the dark side. Her mother is described as the one who keeps insisting she defend herself by going to the police, but she is also described as having an abusive father. So how does this all fit together? Who she is has no bearing on Biden’s laying hands on her, assuming she is telling the truth, but she is beginning to make me uncomfortable.
I wrote the same thing but with more words, but I hadn’t seen your post. Yes it was more old boys then in DC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.