Judge Stops Iowa From Defunding Planned Parenthood, Abortion Biz Has “Right” to Your Money

Life News ^ | May 7, 2020 | Micaiah Bilger

[Jeff Chandler]

Those Democrats really, really, REALLY want to kill babies.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Liberalism is a cult. Killing babies is part of their worship ritual.

[reasonisfaith]

What horrible thing drives these people to devote their lives to profiting from murder?

[JayAr36]

Another black robed pseudo-god ruling from on high.

[bert]

A woman’s right to choose.

The ability of a woman to have mindless sex is of greater importance that the life of the baby conceived. She must be free to have mindless sex and then terminate the baby

That is the rational of the liberal mindset

[fwdude]

Do burglars deserve funding in the interest of “equal protection?”

That phrase has been perverted beyond meaning.

[DOC44]

appointment made in 2014.... must be an odumbo appointment

[SunkenCiv]

Among its worst teaching points, Planned Parenthood tells children that promiscuity is ok. “There’s nothing bad or unhealthy about having a big number of sexual partners,” it tells students on its Tumbler page. Planned Parenthood’s booklet for HIV-positive youth, “Healthy, Happy and Hot,” tells young people that it is their “human right” to not tell their sexual partner that they have HIV.

[Blood of Tyrants]

By not giving taxpayer money to PP, you are NOT singling them out. There are MANY organizations that the state did not give money to.

[jjotto]

State court. Was appointed by RINO Gov Terry Branstad.

[Bonemaker]

I'd hate to be one of these democrat judges when the balloon goes up.😎

[Regulator]

“has no valid, ‘realistic conceivable’ purpose that serves a legitimate government interest as it is both irrationally overinclusive and under-inclusive.”

None of which has any bearing on the 14th Amendment.

He’s a one man legislature here. Which is what we all knew.

[DOC44]

Maybe I am not good as searching anymore but I cannot find if Judge Paul Scott is a democrat or something else; searched on Google Bing and Duckduck

[Bellagio]

"Scott said the law is unconstitutional because it violates Planned Parenthood’s right to equal protection."

That is on its face absurd! The judge is a liberal loon arguing that "equal protection" is the same as "equal treatment." He deliberately conflates them under the 14th amendment! The equal protection clause does not mean equal treatment. There is a big difference between "equal treatment" and "equal protection."

14th Amendment equal protection clause: "... nor shall any State... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "

Equal treatment says that no matter what the circumstances, the application of the law must weigh equally upon those it is enforced against... meaning all laws are absolute where justice is even-handed (vacant) without mitigation/mediation or exception to its application regardless of the circumstances.

Equal protection pursuant to the 14th amendment says no matter what the circumstances, no person can be denied the shield/protection of the laws. These protections are equally enjoyed by everyone under its jurisdiction regardless of any prejudice that may exist past or present such as bigotry, race, color, creed, gender, wealth or provenience.

[Revel]

Appeal!

[Bonemaker]

I think Iowa judges are selected on a (supposefly) non partisan basis by peers and then appointed. They are subject to retention vote. Lots of leeway for political mischief in that good old boy system.

[Bob434]

[[Judge Stops Iowa From Defunding Planned Parenthood, Abortion Biz Has “Right” to Your Money]]

Let’s change a few words and see how that works:

“Judge Stops Iowa From Defunding Human Sacrifice Groups, The Human Sacrifice business Has “Right” to Your Money”

No? That’s illegal? Even if people participate willingly claimign that they have a right to get to decide what they want to do ‘with their own bodies’? “Their Body their choice”? Of course it’s illegal-

People should be Aghast at the thought of the public financially supporting a human sacrifice business- but incredibly, they think nothing of a woman killing a living, waiting to be born, human being inside the woman- “My Body My Choice” does NOT apply- because the unborn baby is not a part of the mother’s body- it resides inside her body as a separate living entity-

Objective law states that murder in any form is illegal- Abortion is murder- The woman is NOT simply getting rid of an appendage from her own body- She is taking a life that is not hers to take- She created the life, and has no right to destroy it once it’s created— An Abortion business does not have a right to our money no more than a human sacrifice org has a right to our money-

[Bob434]

[[There are MANY organizations that the state did not give money to.]]

Exactly-

[reasonisfaith]

Sounds like the basic template that inspired the Roe v Wade ruling.