Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2020 10:18:22 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana

Those Democrats really, really, REALLY want to kill babies.


2 posted on 05/08/2020 10:19:29 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (BLACK LIVES MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

What horrible thing drives these people to devote their lives to profiting from murder?


4 posted on 05/08/2020 10:22:25 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Another black robed pseudo-god ruling from on high.


5 posted on 05/08/2020 10:23:27 AM PDT by JayAr36 (Do you want to be a subject or a citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Do burglars deserve funding in the interest of “equal protection?”

That phrase has been perverted beyond meaning.


7 posted on 05/08/2020 10:28:12 AM PDT by fwdude (Poverty is nearly always a mindset, which canÂ’t be cured by cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

By not giving taxpayer money to PP, you are NOT singling them out. There are MANY organizations that the state did not give money to.


10 posted on 05/08/2020 10:37:44 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyrants don't just give you your freedoms back. You have to take them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
I'd hate to be one of these democrat judges when the balloon goes up.😎
12 posted on 05/08/2020 10:42:09 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

“has no valid, ‘realistic conceivable’ purpose that serves a legitimate government interest as it is both irrationally overinclusive and under-inclusive.”

None of which has any bearing on the 14th Amendment.

He’s a one man legislature here. Which is what we all knew.


13 posted on 05/08/2020 10:51:02 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
"Scott said the law is unconstitutional because it violates Planned Parenthood’s right to equal protection."

That is on its face absurd! The judge is a liberal loon arguing that "equal protection" is the same as "equal treatment." He deliberately conflates them under the 14th amendment! The equal protection clause does not mean equal treatment. There is a big difference between "equal treatment" and "equal protection."

14th Amendment equal protection clause: "... nor shall any State... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "

Equal treatment says that no matter what the circumstances, the application of the law must weigh equally upon those it is enforced against... meaning all laws are absolute where justice is even-handed (vacant) without mitigation/mediation or exception to its application regardless of the circumstances.

Equal protection pursuant to the 14th amendment says no matter what the circumstances, no person can be denied the shield/protection of the laws. These protections are equally enjoyed by everyone under its jurisdiction regardless of any prejudice that may exist past or present such as bigotry, race, color, creed, gender, wealth or provenience.


15 posted on 05/08/2020 10:51:33 AM PDT by Bellagio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Appeal!


16 posted on 05/08/2020 10:55:30 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

[[Judge Stops Iowa From Defunding Planned Parenthood, Abortion Biz Has “Right” to Your Money]]

Let’s change a few words and see how that works:

“Judge Stops Iowa From Defunding Human Sacrifice Groups, The Human Sacrifice business Has “Right” to Your Money”

No? That’s illegal? Even if people participate willingly claimign that they have a right to get to decide what they want to do ‘with their own bodies’? “Their Body their choice”? Of course it’s illegal-

People should be Aghast at the thought of the public financially supporting a human sacrifice business- but incredibly, they think nothing of a woman killing a living, waiting to be born, human being inside the woman- “My Body My Choice” does NOT apply- because the unborn baby is not a part of the mother’s body- it resides inside her body as a separate living entity-

Objective law states that murder in any form is illegal- Abortion is murder- The woman is NOT simply getting rid of an appendage from her own body- She is taking a life that is not hers to take- She created the life, and has no right to destroy it once it’s created— An Abortion business does not have a right to our money no more than a human sacrifice org has a right to our money-


18 posted on 05/08/2020 11:07:01 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I’m fully convinced that judges who block laws to protect the unborn are possessed. Nothing else explains their fanatical desire to murder human beings.


22 posted on 05/08/2020 12:34:26 PM PDT by ducttape45 ("Righteousness exalteth a nation; but sin is a reproach to any people." Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana; All
"That is on its face absurd! The judge is a liberal loon arguing that "equal protection" is the same as "equal treatment." He deliberately conflates them under the 14th amendment! The equal protection clause does not mean equal treatment. There is a big difference between "equal treatment" and "equal protection.""

Expanding on what you said about the 14th Amendment…

That amendment applies to the states only those protections that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect.

In other words, the pro-abortion, institutionally indoctrinated, activist judge is wrongly ignoring that the states have the right to make laws that discriminate on the basis of anything that the states have not amended the Constitution to expressly protect.

And the states have never amended the Constitution to protect the so-called “right” to murder unborn children, a politically correct, Democratic vote-winning “right” legislated from the bench by post-17th Amendment activist justices imo.

If equal protections applied, then otherwise ineligible grade school-indoctrinated students could claim the right to vote, for example, in front of undocumented and deceased Democrats, and family pets.

Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government Democrats and RINOs home in November!

Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a third term in office imo.

MAGA, also KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)

23 posted on 05/08/2020 12:38:31 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Just enact a NEW Law that assesses the Income and Assets of ALL Officers of the Court living and/or working in Iowa to pay for Any and All Judicial Edicts.


25 posted on 05/08/2020 1:19:21 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Is there any other non essential ELECTIVE medical procedures in the US that are paid for with tax payer money?


26 posted on 05/08/2020 1:25:33 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

This must go to a higher court. This baby murderer must be stopped. He is not a man to make a decision like this. He is a slob!


29 posted on 05/08/2020 4:11:50 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Why couldn’t liberals have been aborted?


30 posted on 05/08/2020 4:17:49 PM PDT by Fledermaus (ONLY A MORON THINKS 6 FEET IS A MAGIC NUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

German Judges were PROSECUTED during the Nuremberg Trials.

There will be NEW Nuremberg Trials in the future, with Judges like this facing charges of Crimes Against Humanity.

.


31 posted on 05/08/2020 5:54:21 PM PDT by elbook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson