Court Documents from 1996 Show Tara Reade’s Accusations of Harassment in Biden’s Office

Legal Insurrection ^ | Kemberlee Kaye | Thursday, May 7, 2020

[fatima]

Now that there is something in writing she deserves a hearing.

[1Old Pro]

It appears to be the only written record that has surfaced from the time that substantiates Reade shared her account in the years following the alleged incident, though a former neighbor came forward last week about similar conversations she said she had with Reade in 1995.

Only report? Try Biden's locked down records. Blaisey Ford had NO records.

[treetopsandroofs]

Thanks for the friendly reminder.

FR bullies and Hussein Heads love to target me in a Presidential election year, even when and especially, my POV agrees with many others on a thread.

It’s a fantastic compliment, which I try not to let please me too much.

Have a great weekend!

[SJackson]

Does that mean you don’t trust President Trump who appeared on Megyn’s show several times?

[treetopsandroofs]

What an interesting question.

Trump has appeared with BJ Clinton’s wife and I trust Trump.

Why would I not trust Trump for appearing with the other woman I disrespect?

[unixfox]

She went with Me Again because she too was harassed. So they can relate.

[SJackson]

Hillary has nothing to do with it.

You dismiss Tara Reade's accusation, taking the Biden position, solely because she appeared on Megan Kelley's show. Consistency would require you mistrust the President as well based on his appearances. I acknowledge there could be other reasons you believe Biden over Reade.

[TangledUpInBlue]

I’m all for this. But has anyone ever asked her why she has come forward now?

To me, this is a critical question. I mean, Biden was arguably closer to the Presidency under Obama than he is now. So what has changed for her?

[Go Gordon]

This whole thing has Clinton finger prints all over it. I wonder who was president in 1993 when this happened?

[CommieCutter]

Gloria wouldn’t have taken the case.

[treetopsandroofs]

“You dismiss Tara Reade’s accusation, taking the Biden position, solely because she appeared on Megan Kelley’s show. Consistency would require you mistrust the President as well based on his appearances. I acknowledge there could be other reasons you believe Biden over Reade.”

You hve done youself a grave disservice unless you can show where I have ever said such a thing.

Because I do not support Megyn’s “Killer Bees” does not mean I support Biden.

ALL my posting history shows I call him a demented pedophiole rapist, which could have easily been verified before accusing me of this.

[treetopsandroofs]

Who’d have thought there would still be so many die-hard Megyn Kelly supporters here?

[treetopsandroofs]

As long as Big Media reports the rapist way ahead of Trump, our domestic enemies seem to wish this to be thoroughly discussed and “debunked” ASAP.

Their operatives here are busy, too.

[manc]

much more evidence than the Judge and yet the Dem party endorses a serial sexual predator. Speaks volumes about their hypocrisy , and lack a of understanding for women , and their rights.

Why is no one investigating too? The media keeps defending creepy Biden.

[Elsie]

What did JOE look like then?

[Enterprise]

It’s not something I am interested in searching for.

[Brown Deer]

But has anyone ever asked her why she has come forward now?

Joe Biden and his supporters keep asking that question. Are you one of his supporters?

If you've been paying attention, she didn't just come forward "now", unless you believe "now" is anytime since Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993.

My question to you is, what do you think her motive would be for "making a story up", since she is a lifelong Democrat that doesn't like President Trump?

[Brown Deer]

[Brown Deer]

ALL of your posting history is meaningless and worthless, since you have called Megyn Marie Kelly a "WHORE", with nothing whatsoever to back it up.

Is your mother a whore?

[Enterprise]

Looks like nothing much has changed.