To: yesthatjallen
Some of us predicted this was going to happen. I'm not even surprised it was a unanimous verdict in the Supreme Court.
I wouldn't even bother sitting on a Federal jury of any kind, since at least 95% of the things listed in the Federal criminal code shouldn't even be Federal crimes.
2 posted on
05/07/2020 7:39:57 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
To: yesthatjallen
The two were convicted of fraud for lying about a fake traffic study in order to justify the lane closures. P.S. -- The Supreme Court's reasoning here is ultimately going to end up getting a whole other set of Federal court cases tossed: the ones against those parents who submitted phony college applications on behalf of their children.
3 posted on
05/07/2020 7:41:56 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
To: yesthatjallen
You don’t see many 9-0 SCOTUS votes.
4 posted on
05/07/2020 7:44:48 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Rats Just Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election!)
To: yesthatjallen
It was much ado about nothing.
The New York newspapers went wild over it, both the Post and the Daily News.
To: yesthatjallen
The only person who should have been charged was Chris Christie. He was governor and he’s a vindictive, mean SOB. There’s no way he didn’t know about this. None.
20 posted on
05/07/2020 8:34:09 AM PDT by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson