Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen
The two were convicted of fraud for lying about a fake traffic study in order to justify the lane closures.

P.S. -- The Supreme Court's reasoning here is ultimately going to end up getting a whole other set of Federal court cases tossed: the ones against those parents who submitted phony college applications on behalf of their children.

3 posted on 05/07/2020 7:41:56 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
In those cases the parents in question get something of value...monetary value.In Bridgegate that wasn't the case according to the SCOTUS ruling.
6 posted on 05/07/2020 7:46:51 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Just Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson