Good analysis of antibody testing so far.
1 posted on
04/29/2020 1:54:34 PM PDT by
luv2ski
To: luv2ski
Of course Fauci has already put the kabosh on the anti-bodies saying doesn’t really mean you’re protected.
To: luv2ski
To: luv2ski
Good analysis of antibody testing so far.
Agreed. A very good and informative read.
The problem is there are people who will think, Oh, yeah, I had this nasty flu, or cough, or whatever, and I think I had it. And if you said to them, Would you like to get tested? They would say, Abso-frickin-lutely! said Marm Kilpatrick, a professor at the University of California at Santa Cruz who studies infectious diseases. Conversely, people who felt totally healthy could be less inclined to participate.
And count me in group #1. Had my test done today. lol.
To: luv2ski
Everything in this article was great....until the last sentence:
“how to fight the disease at local and state levels, as a country and as a global community.”
“Global Community”. An insight into the authors mindset and training?
To: luv2ski
Thanks. Not a bad article.
9 posted on
04/29/2020 2:13:30 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: luv2ski
It seems to me all this analysis still hasn’t caught up with the Diamond Princess. (But at least this article doesn’t ignore it.)
10 posted on
04/29/2020 2:30:27 PM PDT by
Mr Radical
(In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
To: luv2ski
How far back would this test be valid? I think I may have had the Chinese flu starting Dec. 11. Is it too late now for an antibody test?
11 posted on
04/29/2020 2:33:08 PM PDT by
Jemian
To: luv2ski
If this virus has a “sleeper cell” quality, there could be the possibility it would not show antigens until activated.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson