Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Trump should either:

1) Pull a Pelosi and say "Try Again" by flat out vetoing current $2,100,000,000,000 pork filled bill.

.. . or . .

2) use Line item veto of the $1,000,000,000,000 in pork. The way I see it 7 new Judges on SCOTUS might see it different than this decision 22 years ago. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._City_of_New_York

1 posted on 03/27/2020 5:45:55 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: TeleStraightShooter

YES!! Ballot Harvesting is VOTE FRAUD!


2 posted on 03/27/2020 5:47:11 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Throw in a Line Item Veto to trim unemployment down from $23 hr... if that’s possible


3 posted on 03/27/2020 5:48:19 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (BHO's version of "The Great Leap Forward" into the government controlling your healthcare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

It’s unconstitutional.


4 posted on 03/27/2020 5:48:50 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

I believe line item veto was declared unconstitutional.


5 posted on 03/27/2020 5:49:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Dont sign it. Tell Congress to get a clean bill and he’ll sign it. Tweet it out. Speak from the Oval office.


6 posted on 03/27/2020 5:49:45 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

The Constitution does not allow for a line item veto.


8 posted on 03/27/2020 5:50:06 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (There are only two genders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Unfortunately, there is no line item veto. He must either sign or veto any bill in its entirety.


9 posted on 03/27/2020 5:50:53 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Dear goodness I think many of us here are pulling our hair out. I thought that the Senate bill did not have the ballot harvesting in it. That is the bill that I thought Pelosi is voting on today. How is it that some of us here still believe the ballot harvesting is in that bill? Without causing utter confusion again can somebody please verify with validity the current bill of the Senate either does or does not have this in it? Thank you


10 posted on 03/27/2020 5:50:55 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Be still, and know that I am God...Psalm 46:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

I thought Nancy’s post vacation wish list wasn’t in the Senate bill that is being sent to the House.

Have I been misinformed?


11 posted on 03/27/2020 5:51:11 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter; All

SOCIALIST DICKTATORS/governors LOCKDOWN LEMMINGS in their states, HOLD ENTIRE REPUBLIC HOSTAGE.


12 posted on 03/27/2020 5:52:05 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

It passed the Senate 96-0. A veto does nothing but delay.


15 posted on 03/27/2020 5:52:32 AM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

1) Works for me.

2) If line item was an actual thing, there’s alot that SHOULD be crossed out but nope. It would be awesome if the SCOTUS had a different take on it today. Maybe in his 2nd or 3rd term? :-)


16 posted on 03/27/2020 5:52:41 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-administration/221151-are-signing-statements-another-example-of-executive


18 posted on 03/27/2020 5:54:19 AM PDT by narses (Censeo praedatorium gregem esse delendum. (The gay lobby must be destroyed))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

The ballot harvesting was removed.


20 posted on 03/27/2020 5:56:53 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

First, the line item veto was declared unconstitutional by SCOTUS. Second, the ballot harvesting garbage is not in the bill passed by the senate. That was in Pelosi’s trash bill that she withdrew when it blew up in her face.


21 posted on 03/27/2020 5:57:07 AM PDT by Avalon Memories (Politics is all about quid pro quos. Donate to me! Vote for me! I'll give you "free" stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

No they’re not going with Pelosi’s bill. She caved. They’re going with the WH/McConnell bill


23 posted on 03/27/2020 5:58:38 AM PDT by Pollard (shadowbanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

I doubt that the people you posted as authors wrote this (| Scalia, O’Conner, Breyer) I hope that they know there is no “line item veto”


24 posted on 03/27/2020 5:59:37 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Best left handed banjo picker on my entire block)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

There’s ten pages of the bill that discuss regulations on sunscreen ingredients and line items for three daycare centers in DC, and that was just stuff I found on a casual skimmingm. all of the ridiculousness was done to buy that 96-0 vote quickly. Good luck finding enough legislators who don’t have a hand in the cookie jar to pass anything. Better Trump sign it and then name some names later than fight it and look in effective. It’s not good fiscal policy, but what actually has been in the last fifty years?


26 posted on 03/27/2020 6:01:22 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

D’rats are raw, bold abusers their offices.

Line item veto the hell out of it, POTUS!

And tell us on TV about ALL their unrelated pork in it.


29 posted on 03/27/2020 6:06:34 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TeleStraightShooter

96-0?
All republicans caved in and voted for this?


30 posted on 03/27/2020 6:11:47 AM PDT by va22030
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson