Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEA Will Return $82K Life Savings It Seized From an Elderly Pittsburgh Man and His Daughter
Reason ^ | 3.4.2020 | C.J. CIARAMELLA

Posted on 03/05/2020 11:14:10 AM PST by nickcarraway

Neither Terry Rolin or his daughter were ever charged with a crime, but that didn't stop the DEA from trying to seize more than $82,000 from them through civil asset forfeiture.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) will return more than $82,000 that it seized from an elderly Pittsburgh man and his daughter after a federal class-action lawsuit was filed on their behalf last month.

The Institute for Justice, the libertarian-leaning public interest law firm that filed the lawsuit, announced today that the DEA will return $82,373 that it seized from Rebecca Brown six months ago at a Pittsburgh airport. The money was the life savings of her father, Terry Rolin, a 79-year-old retired railroad engineer. She says she intended to deposit the money in a bank but ran out of time before her flight.

According to Brown, a DEA agent met her at her gate and grilled her about the money. Brown told The Washington Post that the agent demanded she put her confused father on the phone, and, when their stories didn't exactly match, the agent seized the cash.

"I'm grateful that my father's life savings will soon be returned, but the money never should have been taken in the first place. I can't believe they're not even offering an apology for the stress and pain they caused for my family," Brown said in a press release today. "Without this money, my father was forced to put off necessary dental work—causing him serious pain for several months—and could not make critical repairs to his truck."

In cases like Rolin's, the DEA seizes cash using civil asset forfeiture, a practice that allows police to seize cash and property suspected of being connected to criminal activity, even if the owner is not charged with a crime.

After the seizure, the DEA notified Brown that it was seeking to permanently forfeit Rolin's life savings. Neither Rolin or Brown were charged with a crime.

Law enforcement groups say civil asset forfeiture is a vital tool to disrupt organized drug trafficking by targeting its illicit revenues. However civil liberties groups say there are too few protections for innocent owners and too many perverse profit incentives for police. More than half of all U.S. states have passed some form of asset forfeiture reform because of these concerns, but it is less constrained at the federal level.

Although it is legal to fly domestically with large amounts of undeclared cash, the Institute for Justice lawsuit claims the DEA has a practice or policy of seizing currency from travelers at U.S. airports without probable cause simply if the dollar amount is greater than $5,000. This practice, the suit argues, violates travelers' Fourth Amendment rights.

"We are glad that Terry will get his money back, but it is shameful that it takes a lawsuit and an international outcry for the federal government to do the right thing," said Institute for Justice senior attorney Dan Alban. "We know that this routinely happens to other travelers at airports across the United States."

In 2016, a USA Today investigation found the DEA seized more than $209 million from at least 5,200 travelers in 15 major airports over the previous decade.

A 2017 report by the Justice Department Office of Inspector General found that the DEA seized more than $4 billion in cash from people suspected of drug activity over the previous decade, but $3.2 billion of those seizures were never connected to any criminal charges.

The report reviewed 100 cash seizures and found that only 44 of those were connected to or advanced a criminal investigation. The majority of seizures occurred in airports, train stations, and bus terminals, where the DEA regularly snoops on travel records and maintains a network of travel industry employees who act as confidential informants.

"When seizure and administrative forfeitures do not ultimately advance an investigation or prosecution, law enforcement creates the appearance, and risks the reality, that it is more interested in seizing and forfeiting cash than advancing an investigation or prosecution," the Inspector General warned.

That warning has not been heeded, and Brown and the Institute for Justice plan to continue pursuing their lawsuit.

"The government shouldn't be able to take money for no reason, hang on to it for months, and then give it back like nothing happened, which is why the lawsuit we filed will continue," Brown said. "No one should be forced to go through this nightmare."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: assetforfeiture; dea; seizure; theftundercoloroflaw; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: IC Ken

I’ll probably never have to worry about that.


21 posted on 03/05/2020 11:27:23 AM PST by wally_bert (Spend like you were going to the electric chair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

“Why would anyone carry that much cash on them?”

How about “it’s none of your damned business”. Does that work for you?

L


22 posted on 03/05/2020 11:28:38 AM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

They own him interest and damages, too.


23 posted on 03/05/2020 11:28:39 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder if the author of this piece is related to the whistleblower? Same unusual last name and he a political reporter based out of Washington.


24 posted on 03/05/2020 11:30:26 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

ROFL!!!!

I could have taken a year off with just her as a customer when i had my route :)

well they do have car vending machines now :)

They had no right to take her money but yeah I would DEFINITELY investigate something like that thoroughly or maybe folks in other parts of the country are more trustful or more naive...i dunno

BTW, this virus can’t be spread through the internet can it?

I’m going to wash my hands


25 posted on 03/05/2020 11:31:49 AM PST by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Sure. But it’s none of anyone’s business.


26 posted on 03/05/2020 11:32:13 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Why would anyone carry that much cash on them?

Because they wanted to.

27 posted on 03/05/2020 11:33:58 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (A hero is a hero no matter what medal they give him. Likewise a schmuck is still a schmuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Under the circumstances, I’d’ve done just what Fedzilla did.

Take people's money for no reason?

Are you sure you are on the right board?

28 posted on 03/05/2020 11:35:22 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (A hero is a hero no matter what medal they give him. Likewise a schmuck is still a schmuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Sure, the daughter was stupid. She could have been mugged by a “youth” just as easily as by the DEA.

But, it shouldn’t have taken six months and the pro bono actions of a bunch of lawyers to straighten it out, either.


29 posted on 03/05/2020 11:35:35 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Jeff Sessions, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Strom Thurmond, the Bushes, Clintons like it.

Abolish the DEA-——consolidate the DEA into some other sub-branch of the DOJ


30 posted on 03/05/2020 11:37:46 AM PST by GuavaCheesePuff (I want to thank the Good Lord for making me a Yankee-Old Yankee Stadium (1923-2008))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

“...One cheer for the Kochs...”
-
I am missing the connection to this story.


31 posted on 03/05/2020 11:38:48 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GuavaCheesePuff
Jeff Sessions, Rudy Giuliani, Joe Biden, Strom Thurmond, the Bushes, Clintons...

Now, there's a weird group you wouldn't expect to agree on any issue.

32 posted on 03/05/2020 11:39:33 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I wonder how much of all that cash ended up in the agent’s pocket. And I wonder if the government is going to give the money back with interest.


33 posted on 03/05/2020 11:41:30 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t support civil forfeiture. I get the logic of using this tool to fight crime, but it always ends up hurting normal folks, who supposedly have the freedom to travel with cash. Various agencies outright steal travelers money every year.


34 posted on 03/05/2020 11:45:05 AM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Strom Thurmond? Do you have a source? He’s been dead 17 years.


35 posted on 03/05/2020 11:45:13 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
"NO ONE is gonna comment on what morons these people are?"

Care to explain this? Per the 4th AMENDMENT of the CONSTITUTION, (I know, meh...)

It's why all politicians and badge heavy thugs should face an agonizing death if they violate the Constitution they are SWORN to defend.

With great power comes great risk.

36 posted on 03/05/2020 11:46:06 AM PST by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: catbertz

I don’t think it is a tool to fight crime. It’s a distraction. They spend time fighting noncriminals and give criminals a pass.


37 posted on 03/05/2020 11:46:22 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Absolute violation of 4th Amendment rights. Heads should roll.


38 posted on 03/05/2020 11:49:24 AM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In a just world, these “officials” would all be put up against the wall and shot.

After a quick trial, of course.


39 posted on 03/05/2020 11:49:30 AM PST by samtheman (Trump 2020. Republican House 2020. Republican Senate 2020.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
1) carrying that much cash is severely stupid for a lot of reasons

2) people should be able to do so without fear of their own government

3) if that's the ONLY sign of criminality, that should not be enough to confiscate money

4) I dislike the DEA, and the ATFE

40 posted on 03/05/2020 11:50:23 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson