Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

80,965 Seasonal Flu Deaths This Year / 3,050 Coronavirus Deaths This Year
World Meter ^

Posted on 03/01/2020 5:41:08 PM PST by Enlightened1

Here are the stats.   It is a BIG NOTHING BURGER.

The Flu is far worse and nothing is being said.

 

 

https://www.worldometers.info/

 

and

 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

 

 

(Excerpt) Read more at worldometers.info ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; covid19; deaths; flu; flumortality; justthefluagenda; stats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Enlightened1

.


41 posted on 03/01/2020 6:32:54 PM PST by sauropod (David Horowitz: “Inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“This is fake and engineered by Leftist to crash our economy and blame President Trump.”

If this is fake it will not crash the economy.

The economy will crash if nothing is done and the virus becomes an endemic inside the US. What’s 2% of 320 million?


42 posted on 03/01/2020 6:38:05 PM PST by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Well the media are Democrat activists so any news good or bad about Trump is going to be hammered. Further as the election in Nov. draws closer it's going to be a brass knuckle fight to get Trump reelected because they're going to come out against him with everything in technology to suppress the Trump vote....the media will be full of fake polls and propaganda, social media will be full of trolls and fake accounts, their politicians will lie and distract heavily.....we've only seen a taste of what is coming as they'll be throwing everything out that 'in force'..

Re-electing Trump is not going to be a cake walk for him or us. Any of the Democrat candidates could win, as well anyone who wants to enter if this goes far enough into a brokered convention.....so with how the Demorats operate never take for granted that Trumps a sure thing....he's not. ...Heck they're using this Corona virus and the potential health of the people as a weapon against Trump nothing is past them doing or abusing.

43 posted on 03/01/2020 6:38:30 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"The global pandemic groupies ain’t gonna like this."

You must also be under the impression that his post was meaningful. Let's fix that, again.

There have been over 80,000 deaths from the flu. But that's from a total number of cases in the millions. 15 million in the US alone.

Less than 100,000 people have been diagnosed with the Corona virus and more than 3,000 have died. You don't have to be a math whiz to which has a higher death rate.

And the comparison misses the whole point, regardless. Less than 100,000 people have had the Corona virus because it is new and just beginning its spread. It takes very very little thought to be able to project an uncontrolled spread into the future. Somehow even that little bit of thought seems to be outside the grasp of some people, but still.

The very real prospect is that the virus spreads throughout the human population and we end up with millions of cases of it, too. What do you think those flu stat comparisons look like then? That's the whole point. That's what people are concerned about. It's not constrained to only the people that already have it. Geez.

To be clear, it is not the end of world. It is not going to wreck civilization and cause the zombie apocalypse. Yes, there's a ton of stupid paranoia being posted. But it really is very real threat that could kill millions of people, and cause very significant disruption in our economies and healthcare systems. Stupid comparisons to current flu stats do absolutely nothing at all to argue otherwise.

44 posted on 03/01/2020 6:43:38 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

My wife and I are just getting over the flu. Knocked us on our asses for about 8 days.


45 posted on 03/01/2020 7:00:54 PM PST by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Less than 2% infected actually die from it.


And just so you are clear...you failed reading.

Less than 2% of those reported as infected, have died-so-far.
More than half of those reported as infected...are still infected.

The raw numbers are higher than they will be after people have had it long enough to recover from it, and there are an unknown number of unknown cases (though until the ‘community infected’ began to show up, for those outside of China the number known to be infected and the number of actual infected were pretty close). That said, the 2% number is just innumerate silliness at this point.


46 posted on 03/01/2020 7:01:09 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

The thing is this may very well come in several waves over the next year or two, and there’s no guarantee that the second wave won’t be even worse, as was the case in 1918.


47 posted on 03/01/2020 7:02:14 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mlo

You’re going to be so disappointed. Again.


48 posted on 03/01/2020 7:03:43 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If you don't recognize that as sarcasm you are dumber than a bag of hammers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I’ve been pointing this out! The Coronavirus Groupies ask us to ignore this while they tell us with a straight face that COVID-19 “is more deadly!”

They will NOT deal with the actual numbers in a meaningful way! All they can do is provide conjecture and fear! It’s like dealing with hard core Leftists trying to convince us about the destruction coming from Globull Warming!

I’m weary of this sh*t already!


49 posted on 03/01/2020 7:09:43 PM PST by Artcore (Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The thing is this may very well come in several waves over the next year or two, and there’s no guarantee that the second wave won’t be even worse, as was the case in 1918.

....

Why is it you guys always have to employ the tactics of the Left in order to try and convince people that COVID-19 is more deadly than the flu? Seriously, do you guys hear yourselves? It’s like listening to the Left up the ante about the utter destruction coming from Globull Warming! Just like them, all you can provide is conjecture and fear!


50 posted on 03/01/2020 7:15:49 PM PST by Artcore (Trump 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

He posted actual numbers with links.
You told him to be “ashamed” and that his post was stupid.


Yes, he posted links, and then failed math. In more ways than one.

Dividing dead-so-far by sick-so-far, during the beginning of the infection curve is like having a crowd jump off a 40’ bridge and counting the injured after 1 second. Most haven’t even hit the ground yet. The figures being released show that for those that are sick, just over half are still sick.

The way to get around having to wait until the entire epidemic runs out is to do cohort studies, which neither link includes.

Further, compare the number with the flu Dec 31 of last year to how it has spread since from a much larger and more dispersed base, with no real effort made to contain it geographically (though to be fair also include the effects of a significantly vaccinated populace). Now compare that to the COVID-19 with the same starting conditions. (Flu season usually starts in late September, then often peaks sometime from December to March).

The post was silly.

At this point in time, there are more still sick with the coronavirus than recovered. Outside of China, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Iran, the current ratio is 1 dead per 4 recovered. That’ll go down with time...but it isn’t 2%.


51 posted on 03/01/2020 7:18:46 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The thing is this may very well come in several waves over the next year or two, and there’s no guarantee that the second wave won’t be even worse, as was the case in 1918.


This is only one of the unknowns at this point.

Another is, “how ‘well’ is someone who has recovered?” There are reports of lung scarring in those who had severe cases (the 20%). Not all, but some. Lung scarring isn’t good.


52 posted on 03/01/2020 7:24:58 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

They will NOT deal with the actual numbers in a meaningful way!


Says someone responding to methodology akin to dumping a bin of watermelons off a tall building and counting splatters before they’ve hit the ground - then comparing them to the number of splatters from a dumptruck-full they dumped off the building yesterday.

The proper equation is the number of dead, divided by the number of infected who have recovered. Early in the cycle that number is indeed higher than the final number because it generally takes longer to recover than to die - but it is at least intermediate to the final number rather than being irrelevant.

Dividing dead by infected during the spread of the disease isn’t meaningful.

As example, using that method:

If you were to replace “Coronavirus” with “Ricin”, and inject 100 people with a dose which would kill 100% in a week, then every day double the number of people you give the injection, after one week you would have a fatality/injection ratio of 0.8% (100/12,700), for a 100% fatal toxin.


53 posted on 03/01/2020 7:33:19 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Why don’t you acquire the virus. Then tell us how the experience was a ‘nothing burger’ if you survive.

Which, depending on his/her age, is a 98%+ probability.

You perfectly exemplify the irrational panic over this.

54 posted on 03/01/2020 7:36:06 PM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: teacherwoes

It’s been here for two weeks.

No one believes the numbers in China.

There is not enough information from Western Countries to make many assumptions.

But yeah...it’s the flu. I can tell because they are doing what the CDC does every year for the flu. And Trump addresses the nation every day about the flu.

So, yup. It’s the same thing.


55 posted on 03/01/2020 7:37:05 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
The numbers are probably downplayed. However the other concern for is that coronavirus can comeback and reinfection those who have been infected.

At yesterdays press conference, they said that that was not the case.

56 posted on 03/01/2020 7:44:26 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Humans generally haven’t a good feel for applying an exponential curve to a small sample gathered over a short time period. We will have increasingly more accurate information as time progresses. The results of prior ignorance of incubation period, poor testing methodology, symptom free travelers, and the start date of patient zero transmission.

Up to the point that available resources can cope with a patient load, a low mortality rate is a possibility. Once the saturation point of medical care is crossed, the percentage of deaths could be greatly increased.


57 posted on 03/01/2020 7:48:29 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If its a nothingburger then why do we need to lock down people in their homes?

Why do we need travel restrictions?

According to you we should all step up and take the risk of death upon ourselves to satisfy your need to maintain your stock investments.

If you claim to be smart enough to make good investments then can you not see what is happening all over the world. Do you not read anything. Can you not research anything for yourself? Why do you believe everything some uneducated overpaid news reader tells you.


58 posted on 03/01/2020 7:54:53 PM PST by MRBIGMUTTS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Which, depending on his/her age, is a 98%+ probability.


It is indeed very probable (in excess of 99.999%) that if you catch the coronavirus you will not die instantly. It is also so that the disease would not be spreading if it were the case that the infected died instantly. Your number is derived from not understanding that deaths from the virus happen during the progress of the disease rather than up-front.

The actual numbers even outside of China (with Hong Kong and Singapore) and Iran show much different figures than you seem to think were derived.

Catching coronavirus, and not spontaneously exploding, does not mean that you’ve survived the disease.


59 posted on 03/01/2020 8:22:28 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Artcore
I’ve been pointing this out! The Coronavirus Groupies ask us to ignore this while they tell us with a straight face that COVID-19 “is more deadly!”

They will NOT deal with the actual numbers in a meaningful way! All they can do is provide conjecture and fear! It’s like dealing with hard core Leftists trying to convince us about the destruction coming from Globull Warming!

I’m weary of this sh*t already!


Um, it is definitely more deadly. Here's a bunch of 'actual numbers' for you, since apparently you've skipped all the threads they've been posted on, and can't do some basic research on your own.
Johns Hopkins CoVid-19 Case Tracker

The current John Hopkins numbers have 3,044 deaths and 45,074 recoveries. This gives us a total CFR of 6.3%.

If we look at the non-Chinese numbers, we should get a (somewhat) more accurate picture since the Chinese numbers are completely bogus. That currently has 132 deaths, with 617 recoveries. So our current, non-Chinese fatality rate is at 17.6%.

Even if we use incorrect math and take deaths / cases, we have 132/9046 giving us a (wrong) death rate of 1.46%. Which is still almost 3x deadlier than the flu.
60 posted on 03/01/2020 10:18:46 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson