Posted on 02/28/2020 5:50:47 AM PST by Kaslin
Pundits have recently argued that younger voters, especially those under 30, are less inclined to be bothered when they hear the word "socialism," since they have no firsthand memory of the Cold War.
To some extent, this must be true. Those who weren't alive during socialism's cruelest catastrophes -- or even its many banal failures -- will be less put off by the idea. Then again, if a presidential candidate were praising the excellent public transportation system of the Third Reich or going on about some alleged benefit to American slavery, they would rightly be chased from the public square forever even though the vast majority of voters have no firsthand knowledge of the Holocaust or slavery. Anti-Semitism and racism haven't disappeared, and neither has Marx, sadly.
It's true that Bernie Sanders' fans aren't acquainted with socialism (and, incidentally, this is true only if we ignore the existence of Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, China, etc.), but the fact is that most Sanders supporters don't seem to have a rudimentary grasp of basic economics much less the "socialism" they think exists in Scandinavian nations. What they do have are lots of feelings. And, like millions of other saps over the past century-plus, they've been enticed by the collectivist "ethic" -- its revolutionary appeal, its religiosity and its quixotic promises.
"Fascism is remembered as a crime," John Hayward correctly points out. "Communism is treated like a mistake." I'd add that capitalism is judged by its few failures and socialism by its few successes. Sanders will never praise the "literary programs" of any nontyranny. But if I've learned anything from Twitter -- or perhaps, more accurately, if Twitter has solidified any of my existing suspicions -- it's that academia is teeming with hard-left apologists. There are plenty of fantastic historians out there, of course, but many of the loudest academics, the ones media often rely on, are either apologists for socialism or socialists themselves.
Forget college. There are few more powerful arguments for school choice than seeing a high school kid bring home Howard Zinn's preposterous Marxist history of the United States. I suppose an adventurous young reader could seek out "The Gulag Archipelago," "Darkness at Noon" or "Animal Farm." How many do?
Forget high school. When Sanders says he wants to institute a universal "free" pre-K, I just picture little boys and girls with red scarfs singing Pete Seeger songs because I'm pretty sure that's exactly what he pictures.
Education, or a lack of it, isn't the only problem. As David Bernstein notes, "the cultural elite in this country -- Hollywood, the universities, etc. -- treats the Cold War as if the great world-historical crime of the mid-twentieth century was not Stalinism and its aftermath, but McCarthyism and its aftermath."
Indeed, a person consuming culture during the last 20 years of the Soviet Union's existence, as I did, would be led to believe that McCarthyism was the single worst crime perpetrated in the 20th century -- and capitalism its single most destructive idea. Though collectivism has rained down more starvation and death on humanity than any other ideology, I can recall maybe a handful of films that even took an oppositional position to it. And most of those movies were infantile (don't get me wrong, I love "Red Dawn," but it's silly.) Even James Bond rarely treated the Commies as the enemy. Mostly, he was trying to stop rogue agents from pitting the two superpowers against each other.
Most educated Americans have not only seen movies depicting the Holocaust, but they've seen the horrifying real-life pictures of that genocide. How many Americans have looked at pictures of the Ukrainian famine? Or the Great Leap Forward? How many Americans have ever even heard of those events?
Maoism was responsible for 50 million or more deaths, and Stalinism another 20 million or 30 million, but I can't think of a single important American novel or film depicting those holocausts. Offhand I can recall one American movie that seriously portrayed the inhumanity of collectivism -- "The Killing Fields," though one hopes there are at least some others I've forgotten. That movie is now 36 years old.
Today, though, a person can watch more than one movie romanticizing a murderous thug like Che Guevara (two of them were produced in the 2000s), but not one about the bravery of refuseniks (a group that Sanders, a man who claims he is deeply moved by his Judaism, couldn't spare a single word for on his Soviet Union honeymoon) or courageous anti-Communist fighters of Latin America, Czechoslovakia, Hungary or anywhere else. It's a shame.
No, Sanders isn't Stalin. He claims to be a democratic socialist. I get it. But there's an array of good reasons no one says, "Hey, let's give democratic fascism a shot." There are just as many good reasons not to normalize socialism. At their core, both ideologies are authoritarian. The only difference is that academics and our cultural stewards have whitewashed one of them.
How Can Bernie Sanders Happen in America?
Two words: PUBLIC EDUCATION.
We need an amendment to the Constitution banning all forms of communism,socialism and collective philosophies. Short of that another Revolution is needed with armed conflict. The left isn’t going to stop until they crush us. So let’s party.
The same way a Michael Foot or Jeremy Corbyn could lead the opposition in the UK.
Let sanders be! He will be annihilated, just like Foot and Corbyn.
40+ years of PC pandering, not saying the words “ socialist” and “communist” over that time and longer
That’s just for starters. Feel free to add while you still have some freedom left
___________________________
Bernie Sanders can and has "happened" from ignorance created by decades of public school purposeful indoctrination and 'dumbing down'.
********
Charlotte Iserbyt
That’s the way it was at my college in the early 80’s. I was already reading National Review at 18 and knew better, but the argument went totally unquestioned among my peers. Who are now in their 50’s and like their 401(k) balances...but probably still believe it.
America should have flung Bernie Sanders out of political life long ago - only the products of government miseducation have kept him on stage.
The Public School System has been dutifully laying the groundwork for this country to go socialist for over thirty years.
Even small details, like the free school lunch program. Flash forward a couple of decades and you wind up with THIS conversation.
Parent: There IS NO SUCH THING as a FREE LUNCH!
Millenial: Whaddya mean? I ate a free lunch every day for twelve years.
We should have been reacting a couple of decades ago. I fear now it is too late. Winston Churchill was right. We’ll do the right thing after we’ve tried this alternative.
My theory: Bernie Sanders has charisma. He’s like your rebellious old uncle, the one who would encourage you to skip school and go fishing with him. Folks are willing to overlook Bernie’s truly awful views because of that.
You and I are in total agreement on Alinsky and Zinn.
Throw Bill Ayers into that mix (he was basically writing public school curriculum in this country for a couple of decades).
The three most destructive Americans who were never elected to anything IMHO.
I talk to Millenials every day. Lots and lots of them. It’s my job.
Hate to bust your bubble, but no.....the vast majority of them really like his views.
Until Bloomberg mentioned communism in the Nevada debate, when have you heard ANY public figure say that word.
Seriously I first started seeing it here after joining the site
.
Repeat as often as necessary: PUBLIC EDUCATION and add: The UNIVERSITIES. No history is taught. No Civics is taught. No Geography. No Grammar. No Literature. No Et Cetera. We have generation after generation who know nothing but Smartphone.
How Can Bernie Sanders Happen in America>>>>>>>>>>>
Simple reason.
Too soon did we abandon the institution of tar and feather.
The founders thought we would always have it with us.
Bring it back. After a few applications, we would see a much reduced set of idiots trying to divest America of its Constitutional Liberty.
Let’s say that someone dull and humorless - like Michael Bloomberg for example - would take the line Bernie takes. Would the Millennials still flock to him? I don’t know. Your opinion?
Actually, this isn’t a public school problem. It’s manifest by the democrats, but the problem began AFTER the US Constitution was written.
James Madison described the problem this way:
The right of suffrage is a fundamental Article in Republican Constitutions. The regulation of it is, at the same time, a task of peculiar delicacy. Allow the right [to vote] exclusively to property [owners], and the rights of persons may be oppressed... . Extend it equally to all, and the rights of property [owners] ...may be overruled by a majority without property....
Point is, by the US Constitution and founding fathers, you had to OWN property to be eligible to vote for a reason. Without this, you can VOTE yourself money and other peoples goods/services. When people who don’t pay into the Federal government in TAXES are allowed to vote for Federal government candidates, we have a problem.
Now...49% of Americans DON’T pay Federal income taxes. The way to make the Republic work is to make the INELIGIBLE to vote. Problem fixed.
Millions of people in America that aren’t American.
Bingo!
The trick is to put the big rock in the jar before adding the small rocks.
But who is doing that in the matter of resisting our nation's exponentially creeping socialism?
And BTW, not just public education has been corrupted. Private education is way ahead of public education in terms of indoctrination, particularly at the university level.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.