Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radical hydrogen-boron reactor leapfrogs current nuclear fusion tech
New Atlas ^ | February 21, 2020 | Loz Blain

Posted on 02/22/2020 2:19:41 PM PST by Jonty30

"We are sidestepping all of the scientific challenges that have held fusion energy back for more than half a century," says the director of an Australian company that claims its hydrogen-boron fusion technology is already working a billion times better than expected.

(Excerpt) Read more at newatlas.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 202002; australia; boron; fission; fusion; fusionreactor; hbr; hydrogen; hydrogenboron; reactors; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: Jonty30

Technically this whole scheme is utter fantasy from beginning to end.


61 posted on 02/22/2020 5:45:44 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CapnJack

One of the places where these schemes all fall apart is that somehow or other you have to confine the fuel at high density as the nuclear processes proceed. That has proven to be impossible, but even if not, the confinement process requires a lot of energy, exceeding that produced by the fusion process itself, as it turns out.


62 posted on 02/22/2020 6:03:04 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

” That has proven to be impossible,”

Not.


63 posted on 02/22/2020 6:05:34 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

“Technically this whole scheme is utter fantasy from beginning to end.”

And your degree is in ?


64 posted on 02/22/2020 6:07:58 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

This sort of reminds me of something I read about 15 years ago, and to this day can’t believe it never took off. But a city down in Florida was building a large factory which basically had a core that could get hotter than the surface of the sun. Landfills would be dug up and thrown into this - basically vaporizing everything. It would also produce heat which would then generate electricity for the nearby towns. There was a small amount of leftover product which was basically carbon ash that would be compacted into bricks which would be sold various purposes. Enviros sued and it never took off that I know of.


65 posted on 02/22/2020 6:16:05 PM PST by wareagle7295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

Once the lasers have done their stuff the millennials pull out their wands, point them at the sphere and shout Expecto Electricium.

Those sturgeon killing hydro-electric dams/power plants probably have to stick around to power the lasers.


66 posted on 02/22/2020 6:19:32 PM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (All evil and bad things originate in China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

PhD Physics.


67 posted on 02/22/2020 6:22:25 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

TexasGator,
How do you see this new process being possible? How do they “...reaping far more energy from the reaction than you put in.”?

Does their new process alter the equation of Temperature/Density/Confinement?

They talk about new lasers that can produce the temperatures needed, does that reduce one of the other components needed for fusion?


68 posted on 02/22/2020 6:22:27 PM PST by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: wareagle7295

“hotter than the surface of the sun. “

I don’t think so!


69 posted on 02/22/2020 6:24:47 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Explain why it is garbage.


70 posted on 02/22/2020 6:27:30 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
So one horrendous inefficiency is the use of a CPA laser. The efficiency of this scheme is about as close to zero as you can get. You turn mega-joules of electrical energy into kilo-joules of short pulsed laser light, which you then use to accelerate a proton beam with less than 1% efficiency if you are lucky. Only a fraction [a few percent] of the resulting accelerated protons interact with the B11 to create fusion. So already you are operating at about 1 in a million inefficiency without accounting for a single watt to confine the B11 target.

Nor have we accounted for the thermal to electrical conversion efficiency.

Oh, and there is the problem of the cost of replacing the gratings in the CPA laser which have a very finite lifetime and are very expensive to fabricate.

71 posted on 02/22/2020 6:29:59 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

The temperature of the surface of the sun is about 1/2 of an electron volt. The temperature of an efficiently burning fusion plasma is 100 keV or so.


72 posted on 02/22/2020 6:34:20 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

In short, before investing read the prospectus very carefully and don’t put up money that you cannot afford to part with.


73 posted on 02/22/2020 6:35:34 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

You are clearly educated in this field. Is it conventional wisdom that this is simply not possible or is it just that many have tried and failed (with many “investment” scams”) in the past?

The history of science is if something is theoretically possible it is more probable than not that eventually the problem will be solved.

I have been hearing about breakthroughs that would change everything for decades in this field so skepticism is justified. However, I still have hope that one day there will be the person (or computer AI) who thinks outside of the box and solves a riddle that will change everything.


74 posted on 02/22/2020 6:53:34 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I read the headline too fast and came up with “Radical hydrogen born reactor frogs...”


75 posted on 02/22/2020 6:58:05 PM PST by Redcitizen (Nobody needs a 10 round magazine. You need a 30 round magazine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

The fundamental problem with fusion is scaling. Nuclear weapons demonstrates that fusion works well at a very large scale using a fission weapon as a driver. Ever since, starting with folks involved in the Manhattan project people have been trying to figure out how to scale it down to useable levels. Unfortunately there are fundamental problems about stability of confinement schemes and it is just a lot harder than people originally envisioned. It is like trying to turn a glass of water upside down. Theoretically the pressure of the air can support the water in the glass. As a practical matter it is unstable - called the Rayleigh Taylor instability. Similar instabilities affect plasmas, made more complicated by the existence of magnetic fields in plasmas. But it’s an added complication, not a fundamental change in the nature of the problem.


76 posted on 02/22/2020 7:03:39 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

As I 6nderstand your post, the theory is good, it is just not practical using present technology?


77 posted on 02/22/2020 7:14:22 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

First, we need a source for stable dilithium crystals.


78 posted on 02/22/2020 7:21:35 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

“The temperature of the surface of the sun is about 1/2 of an electron volt. The temperature of an efficiently burning fusion plasma is 100 keV or so.”

I really don’t think there was ever a factory in Florida running a fusion plasma where the were disposing of their garbage ...


79 posted on 02/22/2020 7:22:11 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
The theory is fine in the sense that it works in stars, the sun and nuclear bombs. But it does not scale to smaller scales. It used to be thought that it was a matter of technology, but it actually seems to be running into theoreticial limitations that were not recognized then and are not even well understood now, having to do not with nuclear physics, but turbulent [magneto]-hydrodynamics.

It's like the bumble-bee problem. According to classical aerodynamics it can't fly. But then it was discovered that it operates in a different regime and can fly. But then you discover that you can't scale up a bumble-bee to an airplane.

80 posted on 02/22/2020 7:22:54 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson