1 posted on
02/19/2020 11:20:38 PM PST by
Olog-hai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Olog-hai
Oddly, the SUpreme Court makeup wasn’t a problem when “Dick” Holder and Æthelblack the Unready were running the show...
2 posted on
02/19/2020 11:23:24 PM PST by
kiryandil
(Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
To: Olog-hai
He should be in prison for gun running. Let’s hope that after the October Trump landslide and massive rout of Democrats the coup plotters and Obama era criminals are brought to justice.
3 posted on
02/19/2020 11:25:14 PM PST by
Bon mots
To: Olog-hai
Now that there is a real possibility of a Conservative Supreme Court for decades. He wants term limits. Why wasn’t he pushing this forward when the Liberals had a chance to have a Liberal court? Of course everybody knows the answer...
4 posted on
02/19/2020 11:26:26 PM PST by
ktw
(72 ID, Finally Retired after 25 years!)
To: Olog-hai
5 posted on
02/19/2020 11:32:28 PM PST by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: Olog-hai
12 for Legislators. 25 for SCOTUS.
6 posted on
02/19/2020 11:32:53 PM PST by
wac3rd
(Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
To: Olog-hai
Not so much term limits as much as fixed terms of 10 years at the end of which they must be re-confirmed or returned to the private sector.
7 posted on
02/19/2020 11:34:41 PM PST by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: Olog-hai
Two hundred and how many years?
Eric Holder knows best?
Gosh Eric, if only you would have been a founding father.
I may not like it that justices like Ginsberg stay on the court too long,
but there isn't a good way to set up removing these justices that won't
wind up being political in the extreme.
The demoncRats have made that perfectly obvious.
9 posted on
02/19/2020 11:37:39 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(The DNC has a taxidermist on speed dial for Nancy, Hillary, and Ruth.)
To: Olog-hai
Only because Trump can remake the court for the next forty years.
How’s Ginsburg doing?
15 posted on
02/20/2020 12:17:01 AM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
To: Olog-hai
Changing the Constitution requires 3/4 of the States to agree along with a majority of the house and Senate. Holder could’t get a simple majority on his side.
18 posted on
02/20/2020 12:29:55 AM PST by
Starstruck
(I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
To: Olog-hai
Another crook that should be behind bars.
19 posted on
02/20/2020 12:31:00 AM PST by
McGruff
To: Olog-hai
Just another swampter showing his envy of the President.
20 posted on
02/20/2020 12:31:19 AM PST by
Maudeen
(http://ThereIsHopeinJesus.com/)
To: Olog-hai
How about STFU, bongo-head?
21 posted on
02/20/2020 12:34:17 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(I cannot spare this man. I cannot spare President Trump. He fights.)
To: Olog-hai
I’m not saying Holder is totally wrong/ It just depends on who’s Ox is being gored.
22 posted on
02/20/2020 12:39:11 AM PST by
Starstruck
(I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
To: Olog-hai
If they allowed to make new rules than guess who that will favor. They will then go ahead and place statdards that they will continually hold the right to but wont be held to themsevles. Up’em .
23 posted on
02/20/2020 12:50:40 AM PST by
melsec
(There's a track, winding back, to an old forgotten shack along the road to Gundagai..)
To: Olog-hai
Democrats. Always changing the rules in the middle of the game when the game isnt going their way.
27 posted on
02/20/2020 1:24:32 AM PST by
fwdude
(Poverty is nearly always a mindset, which canÂ’t be cured by cash)
To: Olog-hai
Democrats ALWAYS want to change the rules when they’re losing.
28 posted on
02/20/2020 1:30:16 AM PST by
TalBlack
To: Olog-hai
18 years sounds good for him and an orange jump suit
To: Olog-hai
There was a clear reason for "life" term....so the judge would not be political....and need a job after his term was up.
Remember, there is no check on the USSC...They knew it when they wrote it but never figured out a way for a check to occur.......except for a new decision. In other words, precedence is NOT the end all.
And remember, BEFORE roe/wade, there was precedence...you don't kill babies in the womb.
To: Olog-hai
The Idiot needs to just stfu, but that just me......
32 posted on
02/20/2020 1:43:20 AM PST by
cranked
To: Olog-hai
Apply the same limit to senators. If 8 years is the maximum for a president, 18 should be plenty for a senator, doncha think?
35 posted on
02/20/2020 2:46:13 AM PST by
null and void
(By the pricking of my lungs, Something wicked this way comes ...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson