Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrew McCarthy: Why wasn't Andrew McCabe charged?
Fox News ^ | 16 Feb 2020 | Andrew McCarthy

Posted on 02/16/2020 10:44:13 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: All


They only need you to believe it’s going to happen next year.

Hint: there’s no next year.

They ran from Guiliani because he has info on the Prince. Now, a branch of the DoJ where Comey’s daughter works is trying to take out Guiliani.

.


41 posted on 02/16/2020 11:41:23 AM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
McCabe made a deal. It looks like the DOJ wants Brennan, Clapper and Comey. Strozk and Page will also see indictments and the star witnesses will be the Ohr’s.

More made up stuff.

42 posted on 02/16/2020 11:42:44 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

I trust he will keep making cookies in the tree.


43 posted on 02/16/2020 11:48:04 AM PST by HP8753 (Live Free!!!! .............or don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Here is the real stuff from McCarthy’s article which acknowledges my point of McCabe revealing too much if charged:

“No matter the outcome, the Justice Department stood to take some hits if McCabe had been charged. Focus on McCabe’s leak would have drawn attention to pressure DOJ officials had put on the Bureau over the Clinton Foundation investigation (which, reportedly, is likely to be closed without charges). It would also renew interest in the question of whether the FBI improperly allowed McCabe to play a role in Clinton-related investigations when his wife, as a political candidate, got major funding from Clinton-tied sources.”

“..... that the Justice Department and FBI did not comply with regulations in what appears to be the rushed termination of McCabe, adding heft to the former deputy director’s claim that he was being singled out for abusive treatment, potentially including prosecution, because of vengeful politics.”


44 posted on 02/16/2020 11:52:22 AM PST by Auslander154 ("Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Two-Tiered Justice System - bump for later...…….


45 posted on 02/16/2020 11:57:59 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auslander154
“..... that the Justice Department and FBI did not comply with regulations in what appears to be the rushed termination of McCabe, adding heft to the former deputy director’s claim that he was being singled out for abusive treatment, potentially including prosecution, because of vengeful politics.”

The "politics", vengeful or not, are irrelevant when there are real reasons to prosecute.

46 posted on 02/16/2020 11:59:58 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Auslander154

Another point made by me and others here and reverberated in the McCarthy article:

“Finally, we must note that when the District of Columbia is the venue for any prosecution with political overtones, Justice Department charging decisions must factor in the jury pool, which is solidly anti-Trump.”

“And the jury would be weighing against that evidence (a) whatever problems caused prosecutors at the U.S. attorney’s office to beg off, and more significantly, (b) defense arguments that McCabe would not have been fired or prosecuted if not for the fact that he had gotten crosswise with a president of the United States whom at least some of the jurors are apt to dislike.”

My solution is that Washington DC should be a safe zone from any federal jury trial. Abolish the DC district court.

There are 93 other district courts to choose from and 13 circuit courts in this country. Washington DC has 120 judges in their two courts. Good riddance.


47 posted on 02/16/2020 12:02:04 PM PST by Auslander154 ("Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
The “politics”, vengeful or not, are irrelevant when there are real reasons to prosecute.

Exactly.

If the government is headed in the direction of becoming a banana republic if we do nothing, there is zero excuse for doing nothing. It is the very time to act.

As for the DC court system being rotten, it seems that the chief justice could rule that a federal case may be tried in any federal court in the US.

Regardless, present rules and laws allow appeal eventually to the Supreme Court.

48 posted on 02/16/2020 12:11:20 PM PST by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Because they didn’t think they could get a non-biased (meaning not anti-Trump!) DC jury!


49 posted on 02/16/2020 12:15:22 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It amazes me how many gullible Freepers think President Trump is stupid.

Like good progressives they swallow the media line and recreate lore to justify their perversion


50 posted on 02/16/2020 12:18:28 PM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut
...tell that to Flynn, with whom the FBI conducted a brace-style interview — at the White House, without his counsel present, and in blithe disregard of procedures for FBI interviews of the president’s staff — despite the absence of a sound investigative basis for doing so, and whom Mueller’s maulers squeezed into a guilty plea anyway.

"Mueller's Maulers" -- indeed!

Thanks for the CTH link. I'll read that. The McCarthy and J. Christian Adams articles and the abuses they chronicle at the DOJ have me so incensed this morning!

51 posted on 02/16/2020 12:23:43 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reily


Then they should close up shop and admit they only Prosecute Republicans.

A DoJ that doesn’t follow the Law?’

Maybe, the Dept of Politics is more appropriate.

.


52 posted on 02/16/2020 12:26:02 PM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
He seriously damaged both his credibility and his case when he pleaded guilty in the first place.

You and your family are faced with financial ruin for all eternity. You are up against the infinitely deep pockets of the prosecutors. How many people have the fortitude and the deep resources to stand up against that onslaught?

53 posted on 02/16/2020 12:28:13 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Exactly. Maybe they weren’t even able to get a grand jury to indict.


54 posted on 02/16/2020 12:32:06 PM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Auslander154

“Abolish the DC district court.” — that is an excellent recommendation. The DC District Court is nothing but a tool of the deep state and does their bidding. The inherent conflict is so obvious on its face — everybody in the greater metropolitan DC area extending far into Virginia and Maryland makes their living off FedZilla. That conflict should disqualify every one of the 6.1 million people in the greater Washington DC metro area from serving on a federal jury.


55 posted on 02/16/2020 12:33:27 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The people in DC aren’t subject to the same laws the rest of us our bound to for some reason.

I think I see a big problem on the horizon for the DC fat-cats. Americans have had about enough of this.


56 posted on 02/16/2020 12:36:29 PM PST by Bullish (Covfefe Happens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Not saying this is an honest DOJ. Even if the DOJ was screamingly proGOP if they know there is no possibility of a guilty verdict or even an indictment from a grand jury they’re not going to pursue the case.


57 posted on 02/16/2020 12:37:11 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“...the DOJ wants Brennan, Clapper and Comey. Strozk and Page will also see indictments...”

May you be a prophet among us!


58 posted on 02/16/2020 12:39:08 PM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When there is no justice, there’s just us.


59 posted on 02/16/2020 12:39:26 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auslander154

Good points, but wrong solution. Forget about the DC District Court. My recommendation would be to eliminate the U.S. Department of Justice in its entirety. It didn’t even exist until 1870, and at least 95% of the criminal cases in these courts involve matters that shouldn’t even be Federal crimes.


60 posted on 02/16/2020 12:44:13 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson