Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders Pentagon to halt work on cloud-computing contract amid Amazon challenge
The Hill ^ | 02 13 2020 | Emily Birnbaum

Posted on 02/13/2020 12:46:06 PM PST by yesthatjallen

A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Pentagon to halt its work on a controversial cloud-computing contract amid a court challenge by Amazon, notching a major win for the tech giant as it seeks to prove that President Trump improperly interfered to keep the $10 billion contract away from Amazon.

The Court of Federal Claims is granting Amazon's request to stop the Pentagon from forging ahead with the cloud-computing project until the lawsuit is settled. The Department of Defense was planning to work with Microsoft, the company that received the contract over Amazon last year, to implement a sweeping cloud infrastructure across the entire department despite Amazon's legal challenge.

SNIP

Amazon in January asked the court to stop Microsoft from working with the Pentagon to implement the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) contract, arguing that the project should be put on hold until the courts work out whether Microsoft deserved to receive the lucrative deal.

The request comes amid a lawsuit from Amazon alleging the Pentagon allowed Trump to exert "improper influence" over the contract process, ultimately steering the cloud-computing project away from the online retail giant and toward Microsoft. Amazon, the leader in the cloud-computing marketplace, was the clear front-runner in the competition before Trump began publicly intervening in the process last summer.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: amazon; microsoft; pentagon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
I find this order ridicules.

Microsoft was chosen over Amazon. The decision was made Microsoft 'deserved to receive the lucrative deal' not Amazon.

1 posted on 02/13/2020 12:46:06 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Microsoft was chosen over Amazon. The decision was made Microsoft 'deserved to receive the lucrative deal' not Amazon.

The deep state did not approve- that has to happen first and foremost.
2 posted on 02/13/2020 12:47:46 PM PST by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Let me guess...

Amazongate! Impeach!


3 posted on 02/13/2020 12:49:31 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Time to up our FR Monthlies by 5-10%. You'll < hardly miss it and it will help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This strikes me as another liberal judge smitten with a god complex who think he/she now rules the roost. SCOTUS needs to address this problem NOW!


4 posted on 02/13/2020 12:49:40 PM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Having Amazon handle dod stuff is frightening.


5 posted on 02/13/2020 12:51:45 PM PST by Vision (Obama corrupted, sought to weaken and fundamentally change America; he didn't plan on being stopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Basically the lower courts and congress believe they are in a superior position to the executive branch.


6 posted on 02/13/2020 12:52:34 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Was there a “None of the Above” choice?

I’m not sure I like the idea of either of these companies getting DOD cloud contracts.


7 posted on 02/13/2020 12:53:20 PM PST by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

I wonder if it will be part of Amazon Prime?


8 posted on 02/13/2020 12:54:16 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

No, if that were true, there would be no military contracts


9 posted on 02/13/2020 12:54:47 PM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Microsofts gov cloud is just as good as AWS.

Plus MS has better offers at the ‘edge’s of networks to more localize processing and data.


10 posted on 02/13/2020 12:55:26 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

“Would you like to play a game?”


11 posted on 02/13/2020 12:56:11 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert
No, if that were true, there would be no military contracts

You're kidding, right? Military contracts are the most deeply ingrained.
12 posted on 02/13/2020 12:59:38 PM PST by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

How about a nice game of thermonuclear war?


13 posted on 02/13/2020 12:59:51 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Amazon I am sure is contending the process by which they were chosen was unfair....

Which I am sure it was... because these decisions are always greased palms... and driven by politics not who’s the best for the job.

Hell, the DOD is now going to spend BILLIONS a year to be on a commercial EMR, even though they have have had their own one that was built completely for their specifications with your tax dollars for decades....

My experience with both of these companies in about 30 years in the IT industry, Microsoft’s Cloud Solutions are behind the curve... and Amazon has its own sets of issues as well. Personally I feel ZERO confidence with either of these vendors being part our vital military backbone...

But you go to war with the army you have....


14 posted on 02/13/2020 1:00:08 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

The CIA was the first major government customer of Amazon cloud. This gave Amazon a huge leg up on the competition, by being able to tout the CIA as their largest customer.

But when other potential customers who had similar security requirements investigated possibly moving their data over, the Amazon cloud didn’t appear to meet the necessary requirements. Speculation began that either the CIA data wasn’t properly protected, or that they were given a sweetheart deal in order for Amazon to get their data, or most likely a combination of both.

There has also been speculation that the Bezos purchase of the Washington Post was related to the CIA deal, in Project Mockingbird manner. My guess is the CIA could even be involved in this contract protest, in some manner, as Amazon’s cloud strength could indirectly if not directly benefit them as well.


15 posted on 02/13/2020 1:04:47 PM PST by Golden Eagle (There is no difference between the Eric Holder Justice Department and Jeff Sessions - DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
But you go to war with the army you have...

Are there other US companies who could provide the service other than MS or Amazon?

16 posted on 02/13/2020 1:06:47 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Partisan Obama judge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_E._Campbell-Smith

The good news is this could cost Amazon $42 million.


17 posted on 02/13/2020 1:08:26 PM PST by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
So now we have a Federal Judge impeding a National Security imperative.

That judge needs to get removed. ASAP.

And President Trump should order the work to continue, forcing this to the USSC ASAP also.

18 posted on 02/13/2020 1:08:43 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

This strikes me as another liberal judge smitten with a god complex who think he/she now rules the roost. SCOTUS needs to address this problem NOW!
*******************************************************
Well, it was an Obama appointed judge who made this ruling but who know if any political bias entered in the decision.


19 posted on 02/13/2020 1:09:52 PM PST by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

So now we have a Federal Judge impeding a National Security imperative.
= =

Yes, right to the point!


20 posted on 02/13/2020 1:10:59 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson